Dear Vortex, I have some data for the TEC project. After a number of years of project mismanagement and the sacking of a supervisor, I have a new supervisory team who told me I was trying to do too much at once. Terrible problems were encountered with power electronics and so forth in the quest for a device that was over-unity. The new team told me to break the project up and so I came up with the following scalable experiments, each of which proves the thesis, however the latter experiments are obviously more gratifying:
1) Independent flux concept. 2) Cooling of an isolated reservoir. 3) Excess power generation. On 1) If you read the papers is the link below (go to the thermo-electric link), specifically 'ERA2005', 'ERA2004' and appendicii of the first two papers you will see what we mean by the independent flux concept. We have two terms in an energy equation, one is just the field energy the other is dipole work. The latter term is limitless and represents energy external to the electrical system entering it. **This term will be the heat conversion to electricity.** The data shown in the slides for ERA2005 13, 14 and 15 show the term acting as a stiff voltage source so the decay rate is not affected. When there is no ferrofluid in the core, the flux is just dependent, energy is constant and hence loading affects the decay rate. **So there is no doubt about it the effect occurs.** We shall do more experiments and present this more formally with full kit and materials. Discussion with supervisors and others say some might find this a little subtle and we should wait until the second experiment before submitting to mainstream journals (avoid doing a P+F and condemn it to crankdom! Extraordinary claims, extraordinary evidence.) On 2) We are beginning to design for this. We will aim for unequivocal cooling not some talking shop statistical analysis. On 3) A comparative easy step on from 2. Small amounts of power from heat being converted to electricity is already occurring in (1) but not enough to break even though. The other stuff on the website (propulsion and signalling) I am thinking about and will put material hopefully by the end of year. I think the third project is practically easier than the second but I am beginning to have good theoretical ideas for a mechanism based on real phenomena (not ZPE). I always work on the basis that, if a phenomenon exists follow the consequences no matter how weird. I won't discuss these projects until I have composed my thoughts into some coherent paper. They need more work. ....................................... Website http://luna.bton.ac.uk/~roc1 ....................................... Excuse me if I don't stick around, I respect your forum but find it a little too 'nerd-macho' sometimes (especially vortex) and I don't suffer the sort. Regards, Remi.
