Jones Beene wrote: > > Fred, > > "The (Ps -) can replace any electron of any atom but with the > result that changes the wave function (energy state) of that atom. > > Further it is believed that external energy sources (photons or > strong agitation) can cause metastable storage or stimulated > dumping of these energy states, as evidenced by the PAGD, MAHG or > the Hydrino etc." > > Back a few months ago, when we considered the possibility that the > (hypothesized) compound triad lepton particle: electronium (*e-) , > when it would be substituting for an electron, could be identical > to what Mills was calling hydrino hydride, there was this major > problem of size... > I Have no problem with the radius R of the (Ps -) or (*e-) Jones.
Corrected for the Compton wavelength 2(pi)R, R =3.86E-13 meters. R = kq^2/E = 2.304E-28/(.511E6*1.6E-19) = 2.81E-15 meters for the electron but the R of the (Ps-) recognized in physics circles or (*e-) which we called Electronium will be slightly larger (loop or quark radius R = twice that of the positron or electron if each loses half their energy as binding energy). The radius R' of the three bound loops or quarks in the nucleus = kq^2/E at 312 MeV per loop/quark = 4.6E-18 meters. Corrected for the Compton wavelength 2(pi)R', R' = 6.32E-16 meters Either way the electron or (*e-) radius is about 612 times that of the nucleus. > > i.e the glove didn't fit, so we had to aquit... so to speak, > unless the triad takes on a much more compact size, as do three > quarks (supposedly). > > Assuming that Ps itself is the same diameter as the Bohr atom - > but consists of an electron and a positron (same mass, opposite > charge) orbiting round their common center of mass, then there is > the huge problem of (*e-) or Ps- (if that is what we are going to > call it) being ewven larger - as are all negative ions. > Wrong assumption. :-) > > Consequently, if the orbital diameter for a hydrino were half the > Bohr radius then the (*e-) would actually "not fit" without > overlapping the proton itself... > Half of 5.29E-11 is Huge compared to 2*2.81E-15 0R 2*3.86E-13 which will allow Hydrino Orbits Radii down to 1/137th the Bohr Radius or Hydrino energy "dumps" of 1,864 eV or more. Frederick > > Jones > >
