From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Date: 7/8/2005 1:28:11 PM
 Subject: [BOBPARKS-WHATSNEW] What's New Friday July 8, 2005

 WHAT’S NEW   Robert L. Park   Friday, 8 Jul 05    Washington, DC

 1. POLITICAL SCIENCE: IS THE CONGRESSMAN DOING CLIMATE STUDIES?  Who among
 us has not engaged in disputes over research findings? Disagreements
 between researchers are a normal part of the scientific process.  The
 success and credibility of science is anchored in the willingness of
 scientists to make their data and methods available to other scientists for
 independent testing.  Openness is a sacred obligation.  However, three
> scientists, who have had their share of such disputes, recently received
 letters from Representative Joe Barton (R-TX), chairman of the House Energy
 and Commerce Committee, demanding complete records, going back 10 years, of
 their paleoclimate work, including computer codes and a list of all studies
 on which they were authors and the source of funding – by next Monday.
 Their climate studies, which support global warming, figured prominently in
 the 2001 report of the UN’s Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change.  It
 seems unlikely that Rep Barton plans to repeat their studies; his record of
 support for environmental legislation is 0%.  Barton is, however, among the
 top recipients of campaign contributions from the oil and gas industry, and
 the aggressive tone of his letters sounds to most scientists like an effort
 to intimidate.

 2. WHAT’S IN A NAME?  A SUGGESTED PUBLIC NAME CHANGE FOR APS.   When APS
 first opened a tiny Washington Office in 1984, it said “American Physical
 Society” on the door.  I ran into a lawyer who had an office on the same
 floor, “You’re the Physical Society guy aren’t you?  I’d like to come by
 and talk to you; I need to lose about 20 pounds.”  I stepped back and
 looked him over, “closer to 40 I’d say.”  In any case, our name causes
 confusion.  It would have been better if it had been done 100 years ago,
 but it’s not going to get any easier, so the Executive Board voted
 unanimously to poll the membership changing the public name of the society
 to American Physics Society.  So far, about 75% favor the change.

 3. IDENTITY THEFT: HIDING FROM THE FREEDOM OF INFORMATION ACT. The 1966
 Freedom of Information Act was a tribute to the self-confidence of our
 nation.  No other nation has anything like it. But agencies hate it, and
 keep finding new loopholes that have to be plugged,
 http://www.bobpark.org/WN94/wn090294.html.  Last week, the Federation of
 American Scientists filed a lawsuit charging that the National
 Reconnaissance Office has been hiding unclassified budget records by
 invoking the “operational files” exemption.  “Operational files” refers to
 records that document how foreign intelligence is collected, which these
 files aren’t.

 4. CATHOLICS TOO!  ARCHBISHOP FINDS A LITTLE INTELLIGENT DESIGN.  In
 yesterday’s New York Times, Cardinal Schoenborn, editor of the official
 Catechism, rejected John Paul II’s supposed acceptance of neo-Darwinism
 when he said evolution was “more than just a hypothesis.”  Schoeborn goes
 on to quote Pope Benedict XVI, “We are not some casual and meaningless
 product of evolution.”  Well,  that’s it, if we believe in science we’re on
 our own.  On the other hand, the Church’s position is evolving.

 THE UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND.
 Opinions are the author's and not necessarily shared by the
 University of Maryland, but they should be
 ---
 Archives of What's New can be found at http://www.bobpark.org
 What's New is moving to a different listserver and our
 subscription process has changed. To change your subscription
 status please visit this link:
 http://listserv.umd.edu/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=bobparks-whatsnew&A;=1


Reply via email to