I found this article by Bearden rather interesting
both in relation the MAHG and the idea that....
-----------------------------------------------
the "static" EM field must be more correctly
regarded as in Van Flandern's analogy of a
sort of "perfect waterfall", whose total form
appears static, but with that "static envelope"
made of internal parts in continuous motion,
with each part moving out of any position noted
and being replaced by the part behind it.
-----------------------------------------------
....a view which is concordant with the BEAP hypothesis
in that it treats charge as a dynamic entity in a state
of flux rather than a static entity with the fixity of
the Laws of the Medes and Persians.
=============================================
THE ATOMIC HYDROGEN REACTION
http://cheniere.org/misc/a_h%20reaction.htm
-------------------------------------------
Foreword by Tom Bearden:
Here is an interesting excerpt from Lyne's
book which, although not from a standard
scientific journal, appears to have some
vital information in it, particularly with
regard to early hydrogen welding processes
and other processes such as the Papp engine.
We stress that statements in the article
where Lyne simply rejects general relativity
etc., and using his own terminology, should
not be taken too literally since it is his
opinion. Further, that is not the important
part of his information advanced.
In modern quantum field theory, the charge
(such as a proton which is atomic hydrogen
without its electron) is considered an
infinite bare charged mass in the middle
surrounded by infinite virtual charged
masses of opposite sign. The difference
between the two infinities is finite, so the
external observer looking through the
"shielding screen" of the outer charge sees
its difference with the sign of the inner
charge, and thus sees a finite value for the
inner charged mass, even though infinite
charges are involved. In short, he "sees"
or observes the standard textbook value for
the charge and its mass. But by the
asymmetry of opposite charges, two infinite
charges of opposite sign can in fact pour
out EM energy indefinitely (unceasingly).
The original charges of the early universe
have been doing so for some 14.7 billion
years, assuming the best observational
determinations of the age of the universe.
With the discovery of broken symmetry in
1957, one of the proven broken symmetries
is that of opposite charges. The classical
"isolated charge" (such as the proton/atomic
hydrogen), is actually a charge ensemble of
opposite charges. Hence a priori the
"isolated charge" (classical view) must
demonstrate the asymmetry of opposite
charges in the quantum field theoretic view.
This means that the charge really does
continuously absorb virtual photon energy
from the vacuum, coherently integrate it
into observable photons, and re-emit that
EM energy as real, observable photons
radiating in all directions at light speed.
This radiated real EM energy establishes
and continuously replenishes the associated
fields and potentials of the source charge,
radially outward at light speed. So atomic
hydrogen (the proton) does indeed
continuously extract virtual energy from
the active vacuum, integrate it into real
observable energy, and radiate that real
EM energy outward.
This focuses strong attention on the gross
inaccuracy of the present view of the
"static EM field" (as from a charge or a
dipole such as a permanent magnet) in both
physics and electrical engineering. The EM
field in space is comprised of real
observable photons, else we must discard
quantum mechanics, quantum field theory,
quantum electrodynamics, and much of physics.
Further, a photon in space is moving at light
speed a priori. So (in spite of the odd view
of some physicists and most engineers), the
"static" EM field must be more correctly
regarded as in Van Flandern's analogy of a
sort of "perfect waterfall", whose total
form appears static, but with that "static
envelope" made of internal parts in
continuous motion, with each part moving out
of any position noted and being replaced by
the part behind it. The EM field in space
is that sort of structure, where its
"internal parts" are photons and the photons
are moving at light speed.
The point is that any charge produces a
continuous flow of real, usable EM energy
from the vacuum. Thermodynamically we are
describing a nonequilibrium steady-state
(NESS) system, and such a system is permitted
to continuously emit energy (received from
its environment). The charge also falsifies
the present second law of thermodynamics to
any size level and time duration desired,
because the emitted photons do form
deterministic EM fields and potentials as a
function of radial distance. One calculates
the field intensity and potential intensity
at any radial point, by a deterministic
formula -- not by the use of statistics.
Stated in the language of thermodynamics,
the charge consumes positive entropy
(disordered and uncontrolled energy) in the
virtual state, and coherently integrates it
to ordered and controlled energy in the
observable state, which is a negative
entropy operation producing useful EM energy
in the observable state.
Here is the secret of the "coherent
integration" process of the source charge.
By absorbing a virtual photon, the energy of
that virtual photon (divided by c-squared)
provides a virtual change to the mass m of
the charge. But that mass is integral and
unitary! The entire mass is what is changed,
not just some part of it. Then another
virtual photon is absorbed, with a second
virtual change of the mass, COHERENTLY added
to that first virtual change because the mass
change is unitary. Hence the iterative
virtual changes of the mass of the charge add
coherently until sufficient mass accumulates
(when multiplied by c-squared) to constitute
the energy of an observable photon. At that
point the virtual excitation of the mass
decays by emitting a real, observable photon.
The process iteratively proceeds with a
rapidity that is mind boggling.
The end result is to put some real substance
into Lyne's observations on the excess energy
from atomic hydrogen, which is equivalent to
the excess energy from the proton. The proton
(and any other charge, viewed in the quantum
field theory manner) is continuously and
ceaselessly pouring out real EM energy
extracted and coherently integrated (RE-ORDERED
and RECOVERED) from the disordered virtual
energy of the seething vacuum. So the only
barrier to COP>1.0 EM performance with atomic
hydrogen is in the process or method used to
diverge and collect sufficient of the
continuously flowing "gusher" of real EM
energy from each atom (each proton). Or,
viewed thermodynamically, COP>1.0 performance
is permitted by the NESS process, as is
already well known in the thermodynamics of
nonequilibrium steady state systems. It's
rather like a windmill in a steady wind. It
can permissibly change the form of its input
energy to a different form of output energy,
and part of that output energy can be
intercepted, collected, and dissipated to
power external loads. The common solar cell
does the same thing, receiving observable
photons from its environment and outputting
electrical energy.
So the reader is urged to simply consider
the fundamental information in Lyne's cogent
writing, in light of the foregoing discussion,
and sort out the science as he sees fit. The
real point of the article is the excess energy
output, and its availability for use to perform
real work.
Tom Bearden 7/6/03.
=============================================
At the end of the above article there is quite
a long quote from William Lyne's book "Occult
Ether Physics" on atomic hydrogen reaction which
may interest Vortexians.
Cheers
Frank Grimer
