Re: MHFEG Molecular Hydrogen Free Energy Generator vs MAHG

[Jones Beene]

Fred,   If this is true, and it sounds intriguing on first take, then seeking an "exact" harmonic of the 1.420 Ghz hydrogen line should make a significant difference. This would even be more compelling IMHO if the "hard-ball" collision you are hypothesizing resulted in the occasional 3.4 eV or higher ultraviolet photon  ;-). But even without the UV, one wonders if the 21 cm microwave energy itself is being cohered ? That would be very exciting and should be easy enough to determine with a higher frequency scope.   Perhaps the OU effect is so robust within a range of parameters, that just getting close to resonance provides OU, but then we must ask if getting the resonance *exact* would heat things up even more ?    Perhaps getting the collisional frequency up to 8 x 1.420 = 11.36 Ghz or down to 5.68 Ghz would show an improvement. That would be only a marginally higher (or lower) fill perhaps... except.... by now, who knows how close to the original spec, the present H2 fill is, after some 100 runs? Copper is not perfect containment for H2 and there does not appear to be a filling port, so the actual H2 fill at this point in time is no more than a guess - other than the operating parameters could not have changed very much or JLN would have noticed that. Not to mention the hydrino connection - if any is being formed. One might imagine a situation where hydrinos are being formed initially, but then the hydrinos are pumped back up to normal H2 by ZPE due to a 1.42 Ghz coherence mechanism, so that there are no "net" hydrinos.   If any experimenter is contemplating a replication - and is going to buy the similar Svetlana tube and then modify it for a replication, it would be highly recommended (and relatively easy) to add a valve and vacuum gauge to create a filling port so that different pressures, and different combinations of gases - particularly H2 + He (the BLP formula) can be tried.   Jones     ----- Original Message ----- From: Frederick Sparber To: vortex-l@eskimo.com ; jonesb9 Sent: Sunday, July 10, 2005 6:26 AM Subject: Re: MHFEG Molecular Hydrogen Free Energy Generator vs MAHG based on JLN's numbers there are No H atoms or Electrons produced with the 5 watts power input ~100 watt power output.   Rather "Hardball" H2 - H2 molecular collisions in the low pressure H2 gas at an effective temperature of ~ 5,000 K are producing fractional-orbit energy-releasing reactions at a collision frequency of ~ 9.4 GHz. In turn, the pervasive ZPE fluctuations are "restoring" the molecules to the higher energy state to finish the cycle.   Based on this conjecture a simple cartridge heater in a low pressure H2 gas will probably accomplish the same Free Energy results as the MAHG.   The same premise applies to the Griggs, Potapov & Huffman and other devices that can get a Hardball  H2 - H2 Collision.   Frederick