Keep in mind that only two or three of the actual stories on Gene have come
from reporters doing first-hand reporting. In the past year, some news
reporters have been quick to jump to conclusions -- filling in a vacuum
with their own speculations regarding some of the details -- without making
clear that they were indeed, speculations.
So, yes, I would agree with you. The story, as it has been largely carried
and conveyed, likely has changed somewhat as a result of the communication
process. The facts, however, I suspect, have never changed.
Where is leading to? I dunno. I've had a few brief communications with
this reporter ( Izaskun Larraneta) today. But I would pay more respect to
stories such as this one - from a local print reporter who is there on the
scene rather than any story on a TV-news website or AP syndicated story.
The news about the possible accomplice was not news to me, AFAIK, that has
been a consideration all along.
s
At 02:28 PM 7/13/2005, you wrote:
Am I mistaken? The original story had Eugene being shot to death by one
man, now they say he was beaten to death and possibly by two people. Will
the story change again and how is what I am leading up to?
Chris
