> From: Christopher Arnold > There are people that actually refuse to believe that > Remote Viewing is real too, despite all the evidence. > Actually this article is based on the work of much older > studies. Also, Hal Puthoff experimented on this topic > with Ingo Swann in the early days of RV in attempts to > manipulate machines from a distance. > > Chris
Several years ago I recall a couple of news articles that were making the rounds on TV and radio networks that dealt with congress's outrage over the discovery that a substantial amount of our tax dollars were being spent funding exotic research on "remote viewing". The implications were obvious, that it was considered a wasteful project that needed to be shut down, all in the name of saving taxpayers dollars. Not for one second did I believe the implied conclusions of the news article were telling the whole truth of the matter. What made more sense to me was that in the eyes of certain classified departments remote viewing may have seemed to them to be in danger of becoming a tad too visible to the public. Those departments researching this intriguing phenomenon may have decided it was probably prudent to find a way to obfuscate their work from prying eyes. I think a convenient leak was generated. The result was that an outraged congress dutifully fulfilled its noble mission of nipping yet another wasteful project from the budget. Everyone ends up happy! Congress thinks it's actually doing something useful. The public gets a brief chuckle out of the demise of another dubious project. Meanwhile, the classified agencies working on remote viewing are extremely happy about the outcome because, as far as everyone else is concerned, they no longer exist! It's business as usual! Regards, Steven Vincent Johnson www.OrionWorks.com
