--- Grimer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> At 12:24 pm 22/07/2005 -0700, Merlyn wrote: > > > It is a very compelling theory Frank, > > You say the nicest things, Merlyn. 8-) > > > but I don't think it works out. > > But here comes the "but" ;^) > > > > >Picture it this way... > > > >I have a spring (coulomb force) separating 2 steel > >plates (protons) > >Note that the space between the plates is open to > the > >surroundings atmosphere and not sealed. > >The force required to move the plates closer > together > >is very precisely calculated in air at 14.7 psi. > >Now if I were to place the entire apparatus under > >water where the pressure was raised to 100 psi > would > >it make any difference in the force needed to > compress > >the spring? The added pressure acts equally on all > >sides of the plates and so cancels out. > > > I don't see the repulsive force between two like > charges > as something static, but something dynamic, a flux, > a > flow of substance. Now, clearly, the repulsive > pressure > this flow will exert will be proportional to the > difference > between the pressure of the outgoing flow and the > ambient > pressure of the field. If both pressures are the > same, > for example, then there can be no repulsion. > > The nature of the "attractive" force is quite > different. > It doesn't emanate from the charges themselves but > from > the ambient field. > > It is brought about by the Bernoulli pressure drop > in the > flow and counter flow between the electron (at a > pressure > above B-a ambient) and the proton (at a pressure > below > B-a ambient). > > To give a loose analogy which I wouldn't want to > press too > far. The earth receives directed radiation from the > sun > at one average wavelength and transmits it > isotropically > at a lower wavelength. > > The higher wavelength is analogous to the > Gamma-atmosphere. > the lower to the Beta-atmosphere. > What I was trying to illustrate, is that AFAIK the ambient electric and magnetic fields can not really be shielded, and effect the particles from all sides. By considering charge as a pressure you lose the ability to amass charge by collecting particles. pressure being force over area, increasing the number of particles at a given pressure (charge) results in the same pressure instead of a collection of charge. FWIW I have seesawed back and forth in my analysis of your theory. Merlyn Magickal Engineer and Technical Metaphysicist __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com
