At 11:16 pm 25/07/2005 -0500, Richard wrote: > Terry, > > Yes , things are not what they seem. This statement > extends to most science. > Way back when I was in school we were taught crude > oil came from dinosaurs and decayed vegetable matter > and this was in the early 1940's. > > I have been posting a few " ringers" . One is that > the sun may be a transceiver. Receiving energy in > a form we do not understand.
Mmm...I'll buy that one Richard. A transceiver for the Galactic "Sun" (GS) - the black hole - or whatever - at the centre of our galaxy. Since I see the electric-magnetic cycle (driven by the GS) as analogous to the rain-vapour cycle driven by the sun, the idea of the sun as a step down transformer, so to speak, would fit in very neatly. > This energy could be manifested in an event similar to > an arc welder electrode touching a steel surface. > The sun could be a giant piece of ferrite metal (iron) > with solar flares indicating an imbalance of received > energy... > > > At some point in the search for CF and new forms of energy > we must begin thinking creation is NO ACCIDENT of evolution > hit and miss science. > There is a use and purpose for everything. The fact that > rings appear around Saturn could mean there is a purpose > for them. > > Theory of a beginning , a big bang etc. may be leading us > astray like the dinosaurs with crude oil.. Creation may > not be creation as we attempt to " typecast" it. > It may be " eternal" with no beginning and no end, only > never ending phases. This concept is impossible to grasp > because we have " time " burned into our thinking. We may > be interpreting the bible creation account incorrectly. > It may be the event means the earth, and NOT the entire > solar system was created in the six time periods which are > assumed to cover some 12-15 billion years in our time > measurement system. Interjecting bible scripture into > science discussion is necessary because it is an important > written record of the past. If we could get past the > "religion" part and concentrate on the science part we can > study the deep insight of what was recorded. > For example, the book of Job is an absolute masterpiece of > physics principles that have weathered the years unchallenged. > > Richard Yep - It's not for nothing that theology is called the "Queen of the Sciences" and sets the stage for all human activity not withstanding the fact that modern-day academe would think that notion absurd. If the bible is the word of He who made the heavens and the earth then it would obviously have lots of clues at to the right way to look at scientific phenomena. Rest assured you are in good company thinking along such lines, Richard. If you read the unexpurgated life of England's greatest scientist you will see that he spent far more effort cogitating on things theological than things scientific. One could argue that even in his alchemical studies, he had the right idea, albeit that he was a few hundred years ahead of his time. After all, what are Cold Fusioneers but modern day alchemists intent on turning water into liquid gold. 8-) Cheers, Frank
