Thomas Malloy wrote..

>Ah! Ozone..
>
>Surely there is a better technology to use for generating ozone gas
>for disinfecting water in quanities. The systems I have seen appear
>stone age. Somebody out there has generated ozone using another
>technology that may fit what I am looking for.
>
>Richard

My friend, Phil Ratte' has studied the subject of ozone generation.
His preferred use is health related. However AFAIK, a specific
frequency of ultraviolet light is the most efficient method of
producing it. Phil can be reached at 763 574 0291.

Thomas, thanks for the lead . I will contact him. Our tests will start soon on the high rotational speed liquid vortex designs. Some have reported a " glow" or a "corona" or a faint UV light emitting from the center of a vortex under high rotational speed.We have never experienced this event but we have never ran speeds above 3450 RPM. Should the vortex produce UV or Gamma as predicted by some, we may have a ozone generator within the other features we are investigating. The end game is to find a cheap and practical method of pretreating seawater for reducing minerals( salt)  for Desalinization plants together with a method of changing the molecular structure of the solids byproduct.

Schauberger supposedly reported he saw a " glow" in a liquid vortex. This may be merely a reflection of light arriving from external to the vortex center. We notice the inside of the liquid vortex is mirror finish in its reflective features. Shining a light into the center causes the reflection to appear to glow  however covering the entire glass test tank  to block exterior light results in darkness with no visible glow. We are not discounting an " event" may be present that " enhances" the glow while receiving light. We often wonder if this may be happening because the bubbles formed from adding air to the vortex also appear to glow when we turn on a Q-beam lamp.

Many in this group have suggested various experiments to try including microwave, laser and sonics. Some time back Nasa and the University of Houston used peroxides and ozone.  UT -Austin had a program using pressure and 0 2. So much research winds up in a research paper with a simple statement  like.." if we had some more funding we may could come up with some more questions". This seems to be the norm for some government funded University research. Some of the papers I have read should be entitled " send money,ignorance is a terrible thing to waste" <grin>

Richard

Reply via email to