Jones Beene wrote: > > Is this what Fred is getting all "Stoked" up about? > Getting close, Jones.
BTW. water vapor from the air can form a tenacious adsorption layer on the bulb glass, the leaking UV can dissociate it into H & O on the the surface. If you get the spin of one of the electrons in a H2 molecule in the right direction under a hard ball collision it should form Hydrino Hydride which is a LOW ENERGY version of the P-e-P (Proton-Electron-Proton) ---> Deuteron + neutrino reaction seen in Hot Fusion. I'll explain that later. :-) Frederick http://electron6.phys.utk.edu/qm2/modules/m1-3/molecules.htm "Homopolar molecules, consisting of two identical atoms, are inactive in the infrared. The Hamiltonian for the nuclear motion is not perturbed by the oscillating electric field, because the charge distribution has no permanent dipole moment. However the Hamiltonian for the electronic motion is perturbed, and therefore the molecule can acquire an induced dipole moment. If the frequency of the oscillating electric field lies in the optical range transitions between electronic states can be induced. Photons of energy can be absorbed and reemitted. This phenomenon is called Rayleigh scattering. If during the scattering a transition between occurs, then the energy of the scattered photon will be . We therefore can observe scattered photons of three different frequencies. ( Rayleigh line ), ( Raman-Stokes line ), ( Raman-anti Stokes line ). This can also be observed with heteropolar molecules." > > "When a phosphor or other luminescent substance emits light, it > gives in most cases an emission according to Stokes' Law. > > This law states that the wavelength of the fluorescent (emitted) > light is always greater than the wavelength of the exciting > radiation. It was first observed in 1852 in the memoir "On the > Change of Refrangibility of Light," by Sir G.G. Stokes. In terms > of energy the relationship states that e em < e ab. While Stokes' > Law holds for the majority of cases, it does not hold in certain > instances. In some cases the wave length is the same for both the > absorbed and the emitted radiation. That is, the efficiency > appears to be perfect or unity. This is known as resonance > radiation. In other cases Stokes' Law does not hold where the > energy emitted is greater than the energy absorbed. This is known > as Anti-Stokes emission. > > In 1935 Prileshajewa showed that there is an energy difference as > much as 1.1 v between the exciting light and the fluorescence of > aniline vapor. This added energy is attributed to additions from > the internal energy of the molecule." > > However, when the active medium produces excess energy emission, > and continues to do so, then the added energy cannot be attributed > to additions from the internal energy of the molecule, unless the > internal energy of the molecule is itself continually being > replaced from -- you guessed it -- the vacuum's fierce interaction > with the molecule's charges. Further, the dynamic dipoles > comprising the molecule or the particle/liquid boundary, can > produce double-surface E-fields of large magnitude, as is > well-known in electrochemistry. Multipass retroreflection between > TiO2 particles (Lawandy) or between palladium-clad, charged beads > (Patterson) can collect and disperse (as scattered coherent > photons) additional energy from the powerful S-flows of the > double-surface Poynting generators. > > It follows that, by "doctoring" anti-Stokes radiation situations > so as to allow multipass retroreflection and thus multicollection, > a permissible overunity process emerges that is practical. It is > also one which can be developed into commercial overunity and even > self-energizing power sources. > > Excess emission from a medium has been known for a long time, but > not much has been done with it until the work of Letokhov and the > work and inventions of Lawandy. > > Nabil M. Lawandy, "Optical Gain Medium Having Doped Nanocrystals > of Semiconductors and Also Optical Scatterers," U.S. Patent No. > 5,434,878, July 18, 1995; ____ "Second Harmonic Generation and > Self Frequency Doubling Laser Materials Comprised of Bulk > Germanosilicate and Aluminosilicate Glasses," U.S. Patent No. > 5,157,674, Oct. 20, 1992; ____ "Optical Gain Medium Having Doped > Nanocrystals of Semiconductors and Also Optical Scatterers," U.S. > Patent No. 5,233,621, Aug. 3, 1993; ____ "Optically Encoded Phase > Matched Second harmonic Generation Device and Self Frequency > Doubling Laser Material Using Semiconductor Microcrystallite Doped > Glasses," U.S. Patent No. 5,253,258, Oct. 12, 1993; ____ "Optical > Sources Having a Strongly Scattering Gain Medium Providing > Laser-like Action," U.S. Patent application No. 08/210,710, filed > Mar. 19, 1994. See also Nabil M. Lawandy, R.M. Balachandran, > A.S.L. Gomes and E. Sauvain, "Laser action in strongly scattering > media," Nature, Letters, 368(6470), Mar. 31, 1994, p. 436-438.
