I noticed you placed quotation marks around the term accelerating. It may well be that the electron is NOT accelerating in the sense of mechanics which PRESUMES all acceleration is indicative of a "smoking gun" i.e. an external force.
Harry >> >> Putoff's theory, on the surface, possesses an elegant symmetry to it, not >> that I'm really in a position to challenge it. There remains, however, a >> nagging question that gnaws at me. >> >> According to my own provincial understanding of QM theory it's considered >> somewhat of an embarrassment that the electron doesn't seem to collapse >> into the nucleus of the hydrogen atom - due to the fact that it should be >> emanating energy - due to the fact that it is costantly 'accelerating' >> around the hydrogen nucleus. Clearly, this ain't happening! >> >> Now, according to Putoff's model, ZPE fluctuations, more or less, >> instantaneously re-supply the departing energy that according to QM should >> be emanating from the orbiting electron. IOW, ZPE fluctuations conveniently >> prevent the orbiting electron from collapsing into the nucleus, which >> incidentally saves the universe as a secondary benefit. >> >> Never the less there remains, in my view, a HUGE unsolved mystery: >> >> If energy is being "emitted" only to be re-supplied by ZPE fluctuation that >> STILL doesn't explain WHAT HAPPENED to the original energy emitted from the >> electron. >> >> Can someone explain where it all went? >> >> Regards, >> Steven Vincent Johnson >> www.OrionWorks.com >
