> [Original Message]
> From: What's New <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
 To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
 Date: 8/5/2005 12:04:12 PM
 Subject: [BOBPARKS-WHATSNEW] What's New Friday August 5, 2005

 WHAT'S NEW   Robert L. Park   Friday, 5 Aug 05   Washington, DC

 science n. the intellectual and practical activity encompassing  
      the systematic study of the structure and behavior of the
      physical and natural world through observation and
      experiment. (Oxford English Dictionary, eleventh edition) 

 1. THE PRESIDENT: MAYBE THE WHITE HOUSE COULD USE A DICTIONARY.
 Conservative Christian supporters are gloating.  On Tuesday, in
 an interview with Texas reporters, the President of the United
 States came down on the side of equal time for intelligent
 design.  Referring back to his time as Governor of Texas, Mr.
 Bush said, "I felt like both sides ought to be properly taught." 
 Which two sides are those Mr. President?  I don't think we can
 teach the Genesis story in science class, even after you pack the
 Court.  Surely you're not talking about the "intelligent design"
 thing?  Can someone tell us who or what is doing the designing? 
 I think that will tell us whether it's science or religion.

 2. THE FOUNDER: DISCOVERY INSTITUTE DOESN'T NEED A DICTIONARY. 
 The Washington Post on Saturday had a little-noticed letter from
 Bruce Chapman, founder and President of the Discovery Institute. 
 Director of the White House Office of Planning and Evaluation
 under Ronald Reagan, Chapman learned from the master.  Facts are
 not important, what matters is conviction.  "The only religious
 believers in all this," he writes, "are the Darwinists, who are
 out to punish scholars who see the weakness of Darwin's theory." 
 And who are these scholars?  This brings up another alarming
 trend, conservative think tanks manned by "scholars" who do no
 research, but spew out books laden with conviction.  Chapman
 perfected this by recruiting bright young believers to the cause
 and assigning them the task of becoming biology PhDs. 

 3. THE SCIENCE ADVISOR: THE PRESIDENT HAS A SCIENCE ADVISOR? 
 Asked by the New York Times to comment, John Marburger responded,
 "Evolution is the cornerstone of modern biology .... intelligent
 design is not a scientific concept."  Good response.  It would be
 nice if the President's science advisor advised the President.

 4. THE VATICAN ASTRONOMER: CATHOLIC CHURCH SPLITS OVER EVOLUTION.
 A cardinal close to the pope has ties to the Discovery Institute
 http://bobpark.physics.umd.edu/WN05/wn071505.html, but in today's
 issue of The Tablet, Britain's Catholic Weekly, Father George
 Coyne, an American Jesuit priest and a distinguished astronomer,
 directly attacked Cardinal Schoenborn's position on evolution.

 5. THE PRINCE: WEALTHY BRITISH FARMER LOOKS TO THE MOON FOR HELP.
 Tormented by fears of nanorobots turning the planet into "grey
 goo," and poisoning by genetically modified foods, Prince Charles
 fights science by embracing homeopathy, coffee enemas, organic
 farming, and now "biodynamics," which involves planting according
 to cycles of the moon and signs of the Zodiac.  In a monarchy you
 are stuck with what you get, while in a democracy we can pick the
 best qualified among us to lead.  But it's only a theory.

 THE UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND.
 Opinions are the author's and not necessarily shared by the
 University of Maryland, but they should be.
 ---
 Archives of What's New can be found at http://www.bobpark.org
 What's New is moving to a different listserver and our
 subscription process has changed. To change your subscription
 status please visit this link
 http://listserv.umd.edu/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=bobparks-whatsnew&A=1


Reply via email to