This is not important, but I mentioned that I thought this paper is "inaccurate:" Jones, S.E., Chasing anomalous signals: the cold fusion question. Accountability Res., 2000. 8: p. 55. http://lenr-canr.org/acrobat/JonesSEchasingano.pdf

That was unfair of me. Here I am criticizing Jones for offering only opinions, and I myself offer mere opinion. I have discussed this paper many times, but if the readers here would like to know the details I can reiterate some of the reasons why Fleischmann and I disagree with Jones.

The paper in question by Flieschmann is here: http://lenr-canr.org/acrobat/Fleischmancalorimetra.pdf


I expect the readers here have heard quite enough of that debate.

- Jed

Reply via email to