This is not important, but I mentioned that I thought this paper is
"inaccurate:" Jones, S.E., Chasing anomalous signals: the
cold fusion question. Accountability Res., 2000. 8: p. 55.
http://lenr-canr.org/acrobat/JonesSEchasingano.pdf
That was unfair of me. Here I am criticizing Jones for offering only
opinions, and I myself offer mere opinion. I have discussed this paper
many times, but if the readers here would like to know the details I can
reiterate some of the reasons why Fleischmann and I disagree with
Jones.
The paper in question by Flieschmann is here:
http://lenr-canr.org/acrobat/Fleischmancalorimetra.pdf
I expect the readers here have heard quite enough of that
debate.
- Jed
- Jones' evaluation of Fleischmann Jed Rothwell
- Re: Jones' evaluation of Fleischmann Jed Rothwell

