Mike, your tone is patronising.

Y2K was hype to get programmers jobs and make academics look clever. Yes it
did ameliorate to some extent BUT the spiel was that it was all too late and
global meltdown was imminent.

All we ask is proportion and measure in public announcements.   

-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Mike Carrell
Sent: 05 September 2005 18:11
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: Global warming


From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Global warming


> Jed and Vo,
> One has to avoid the shock-horror disaster tactics because the public will
> get sick off it. Remember Y2K and all that?
>
> Yes, plan new technology but don't pull the public's collective plonker.
> Don't cry wolf.
> R.
-------------------------------------
This particular rant is very short of a full deck. The Y2K crises was
averted by *very* intense activity by *many* programmers in *many*
responsible industries to find and correct the old computer code that could
have cuased some very nasty results. Those warnings *were* heeded by
responsible management.

The repeated warnings of levee collapse *were ignored* by politicians and
administrators.

Jed has been reading Jered Diamond's "Collapse", a very thoughtful book
about how human societies have made choices leading to failure. And Diamond
makes clear that it isn't the greedy management of the big bad corproations
which are so glibly caricatured that does the dirty work. It is all of us,
the stockholders who want effortless profits from the corporations, and the
legislators who want greedy citizens to re-elect them, that set these wheels
in motion.

As Pogo said, "We have met the enemy, and he is us". The finger of greed
points in all directions.

Mike Carrell





>
>
>
>


Reply via email to