Harvey,

Thanx for the answers there, a 1976 Scientific American article shows that it can be done, but I have not yet read this article.

Here is the actual order 5 perfect cube, which can be magnified
http://cboyer.club.fr/multimagie/English/Perfectcubes.htm


This cube contains all the integers from 1 to 5^3 = 125. There are 109 ways to get the magic sum 315, with its 25 rows, 25 columns, 25 pillars, 4 triagonals, and 30 diagonals. The center number is 63, which is to be expected since the magic sum divided by the number of planes (5)= 63.

It will be impossible to construct a perfect cube smaller than order 5.

None of the four existing standard magic cubes of order 3 is perfect, and the American mathematician Richard Schroeppel in the Artificial Intelligence Memo of the MIT (1972) proved that a magic cube of order 4 cannot be perfect.

Perhaps, therefore (returning to fiction), DNA should have let DT ponder a bit longer to arrive at 63 instead of 42 ;-)

It wasn't easy, for DEEP you know. As any software engineer can tell you, 42 in base ten is equal to '101010' in base two. This alternating pattern of ones and zeros could be said to have illustrated the enormity of DEEP Thought's indecision, starting from day "Count Zero" to now... about... you know... the Ultimate Question. After all, the base two representation of 63 is much more self-assured - being 111111.

Of course, we can get really off-base... as in the original Hitchhiker's Guide radio show, where the "cave man" put out Scrabble stones and the sentence "What do you get if you multiply six by nine?" emerges, and then Arthur says "Six by nine? Forty-two? You know, I've always felt that there was something fundamentally wrong with the Universe." -- it is at this point that a faint and distant voice says "base thirteen!"

42 (base 13) is equal to 54 (base 10). BTW the Sum of the Proper Divisors of 42
also =54.

Of Course -- Douglas Adams has been quoted as saying " You just don't write jokes in base 13!" but is there any other connection between 42 and 63? Hmm... the divisors of the Positive Integer 126 are 1, 2, 3, 6, 7, 9, 14, 18, 21, 42, 63, 126. That is tantalizing. But the trail has gone dead after that. 21 and 42 are both power numbers, so it is no surprise that 63 is way cool.... even if not necessarily the penultimate.

BTW, to dispel any myths about 42, Douglas Adams also admitted at times - "It was a joke. It had to be a number, an ordinary, smallish number, and I chose that one." Binary representations, base thirteen, Tibetan monks are all complete nonsense. I sat at my desk, stared into the garden and thought '42 will do' I typed it out. End of story

Reply via email to