Title: Re: OT: Übermensch, Buddha and Superwench
I might be wrong, but what I have read about Nietzsche and by Nietzsche, it is my impression
he did not appreciate the need to mourn.
Whether or not THE God is dead or only certain conception of God has been lost,
a significance loss of any kind requires a period grieving.

Harry


Jones Beene wrote:

In order to partially dissent and elaborate on a previous comment yesterday about the "brilliant but controversial German philosopher Friedrich Nietzsche".... JR echoed a commonly-heard PC (politically correct) reaction: "Brilliant? In my opinion he was world-class jerk, and I despise the notion "that suffering is good for people."

Ah...despise him if you must, but understand him first - isn't Übermensch (as FN envisioned it, not as the Nazi's distorted it) really the one-and-only 'final solution' to suffering... or would you have them (the little people) swell the blood-sucking "Idle-Rich-Class" and become the downfall of us all ? <big G>

...and just to be clear about how to best express quasi-cynicism in a vo-post, <big G> means an extra-large smiley - IOW "not to be taken at face value".

Nietzsche was notoriously unread, even during his own lifetime, except by the other brilliant thinkers of the time. A list of his admirers reads like a who's-who of  20th century acumen. However, FN's ideas (in the geo-politics of the era ) suffered irreparable distortion in the hands of his own sister - who for her own purposes twisted his philosophy into full support for Nazism (Hitler had "Thus Spoke Zarathustra" issued to every soldier in the German army for a while). What a perversion! But not for the reasons you might surmise. Übermensch literally means "overman" but which is an  earned (possibly engineered) achievement, not a prerogative of wealth or heritage [not to be confused with the man of steel, nor racial (Aryan) superiority].

<snip>

Reply via email to