|
In a somewhat light-hearted look the
topological number-structure known as the "perfect cube", and in trying to
tie this structure into Douglas Adam's Sci-Fi madness yesterday, the further
thought occurred - what if the Universe is indeed 5-spatial?
Does the perfect cube tell us anything, even as symbolism? After all, this IS the smallest possible of such "perfect" numbered-structure. Very Platonic. The universe may, in actuality, have less or more dimensions, but IF in fact - it is found to have exactly 5 dimensions, then there could be some intuitive relevance to studying this exact structure - a house of cards, as it were ... and some relevance even to ZPE, as you will see (if you can hold-out through another long post) ! BTW here is the site (but if you haven't already bookmarked it - indicating prior interest), then what follows is likely to be word-salad: http://cboyer.club.fr/multimagie/English/Perfectcubes.htm This perfect cube above is depicted as five planes. There are several way to look at this simplification as symbolic of the complexity or real 5-space, however. But in this post, I only want to consider the simplest - which is unfortunately the most likely to lead to confusion. If each of the 5x5 planes (2-spatial) were instead, analogous to sets of 5-spatial "locators" or "hotlinks" to use a WWW analogy, then the perfect cube becomes a more complex analogy of how to get between dimensions (5-D road map) as each of the planes relates to a more (or less) complex structure and all structures are different but interconnected through the numbered "pathways" i.e. "wormholes". Note that only the very central numbered square is a stationary location, no matter how the perfect cube is oriented - it is the *singularity* the one-space. Every other space is relative to this space. We could, in fact "wrap every
one of the 125 spaces into spherical surface area - if that helps in the
visualization - as (in the tradition of the Mills "orbitsphere" there is not
much real mathematical difference, other than connectivity and getting rid
of edges and vertices - which become abstractions. This particular perfect
5-cube (there could be others) contains all the integers from 1 to 5^3 = 125.
This small finite number is a lot more comforting to some folks than infinity -
especially if one wants to eventually build a mythology around having some kind
of repository of intelligence in one dimension.
Plus, the center is at most 4 steps removed from any other potential
location. This is the only built-in "limitation" of this number-theology in that
4 degrees of separation does require "transfer-assistance" from other contiguous
locations, which of course someone will surely term "angelic" but as far as
information transfer - it is QM (quantum mechanical).
In this universe, the number 315 (in addition to 125 and 63) is very important as a sum of all things, but it doesn't have to be that exact number, per se - all of the numbers can be ratios rather than absolute values. The important thing is how they are interrelated - i.e. "relativity" to any other location. There are 109 ways to get the magic sum 315, with its 25 rows, 25 columns, 25 pillars, 4 triagonals, and 30 diagonals. Of course, if there would be any relevance to this exercise, then DNA's (DT's) "meaning of the universe and everything" would be more-than-fanciful, and would be related to the positive integer 63 rather than 42 - no probelmo - he has given me prior permission to do this (in a private channeling ;-). This number 63 is only contextual however, and would need to be regauged or recalibrated for every useful purpose, but in the expanded analogy this IS itself defined as 1-space and if you want to get theological about it, then DNA will be smiling down on you, half-again more. Three dimensions are well known and the fourth - the "hypercube" - is a solid figure in 4-D space bounded by eight "imaginary" cubes, just as a cube is bounded by six square faces. This has been simplified to a plane with 25 "locators" as has the higher dimension. What happens when we add yet another dimension to 4-space? A surprising conclusion of many hyperspace models, in general, is that gravitation and EM attraction can be explained simply as the result of a suction force from hyperspace - what Frank Grimer calls negative pF. In fact: Hyperspace is to a 3-D space - somewhat as the atmosphere is to a balloon or the void to air. The air of the balloon tries to escape to the atmosphere through any hole the balloon has, while the air tries to fill up any empty space (vacuum). In an analogous way, gravitation and EM can be seen as the extra-dimensional tendency of matter to dissipate in hyperspace through small windows between our 3-D universe and hyperspace. This can be envisioned as outward or inward. I prefer inward because of the gravity connotation but in EM we also have repulsion. BTW much of this info comes-from or builds-on. other fringe speculation via the WWW, but the only citation I can find now is: Anyway, these "windows" which correspond to any of the 125
locators can pass information by the modality which we know as quantum spin
- or by virtual cross-over. Hyperspace will also produce a "bulk"
non-information suction force on elementary particles, analogous to their mass
(gravitation) or polarity (EM). Conventional forces like gravitation and
electromagnetism vary with the square of the planar distance but the space
between planes is imaginary and therefore not limited by
lightspeed. Certainly 4-space can also be correlated to the EPO field, and
5-space to the more expansive idea of the "negative" Dirac Sea which "reverses"
back into 1 space.
The Casimir force, which varies with the 4th power of distance, ought to
arise from bosons distributed in a hyperspace with 5 real physical dimensions -
this is the BEC EPO field of Don Hotson. This leads to the prediction of a
whole new world of quantum temperatures below zero Kelvin, and to a model that
has been said to surprisingly agree with new cosmology data (dark energy) and
recent findings of the zero-point-field. Virtual field particles (e.g. bosons
of the ZPF+ EPO field) are particles that cross our 3-D universe interface
continually, thus seeming virtual to us.
Our universe, and the other 125 parallel universes can be considered
as partially overlapping 3-D space floating on an immense 5-D space - the
hyperspace, but is there a "real" limit to only 125 alternative
universes? An interesting point - if you are working on a Sci-Fi
script.
For those of you who successfully mastered visualizing a hypercube, try imagining what an "ultracube" looks like. It's the five- dimensional analog of the cube, but this time it is bounded by one hypercube on each of its 10 faces. Now if you have that in mind, "stretch" the ultracube into an onion-like ultrasphere and you have mastered the whole shebang... or was that big bang? Jones
|
- 5-Space and the Perfect Cube Jones Beene
- Re: 5-Space and the Perfect Cube Jones Beene
