|
I don't believe CF is being suppressed. It is due to most large
international corporation and government indiffrence. CEO's are selected for
their ability to keep their stock in play. The government is a crap shoot
between soliciting campaign funds and playing off lobbyists. As Jesse Unrah once
stated.. if a politician can't take money from all 3 sides and " stiff"
them all, he ain't no politician .
Planning a suppression of CF would take dedicated co-ordination, something
they lack. Perhaps the correct assumption is that CF is in somebody's inbox
or outbox. Giving government credit for conspiracy planning may be a
stretch considering their present performance level. Even the
ultimate brain of Karl Rove missed advising the Prez it would be wise to scoot
over to nawlins pronto. When the politicos miss a shot this easy wez in real
trouble. CF is way down the list of importance..like invisible.
I continue to bank on the notion that notice will come after serious
applications of "near" CF and adjunct applications emerge. There is an increase
in research in related technology that have benefitted from CF regardless of the
drama. Cumulative progress will reach a surge level and what appeared to be
suppression will be recognized for what it is.. indifference.. the "who cares"
crowd are simply not interested in listening to anyone mentioning peak oil or
new energy while on the way to play golf, driving their new Hummer the
government just handed them via a tax break.
Nobody ever went wrong overestimating the incompetence of government.
Richard
|
- Re: CF Suppression? RC Macaulay
- Re: CF Suppression? OrionWorks
- Re: CF Suppression? John Coviello
- Re: CF Suppression? Jed Rothwell
- Re: CF Suppression? Harry Veeder
- Re: CF Suppression? Jed Rothwell
- Re: CF Suppression? Harry Veeder
- Re: CF Suppression? Jed Rothwell
- CF Suppression? thomas malloy
- RE: CF Suppression? R . O . Cornwall
- RE: CF Suppression? John Steck

