Mitchell Swartz wrote:
Cold fusion is now at the engineering stage, well beyond the "basic"
research stage.
I hope so, as I said. If iESi's claims are real that is certainly true. I
await independent replication and confirmation.
And as such, several devices and modifications of cold fusion can, and
will be, patented.
I assume this means they will be patented if opposition at the Patent
Office is overcome -- as I hope it will be.
What is even more interesting is that in the years 2003 through 2005, the
Patent Office frequently has cited the ramblings of Jed Rothwell and Ed
Storms on vortex (along with the plethora of usual anti-cold fusion
suspects) to block American cold fusion patents applications.
That is interesting, and weird. It shows how desperate they are to find
justification for their views. They are scraping the bottom of the barrel.
But in any case, I do not see how anyone can blame us for that! Storms and
I have a right to our opinions, after all, and we cannot be held
responsible when others quote us out of context or interpret our statements
to mean things we clearly never intended to mean.
For example, neither (nor the usual suspects) attended the recent MIT Cold
Fusion Colloquium where several individuals presented and did describe
their reproducible cold fusion systems.
You should publish a proceedings, so that others who were not able to
attend can learn about these things.
- Jed
- Re: CF Suppression? Jed Rothwell
-
