> > From: Steven Vincent Johnson: > From: Mitchell Swartz > > This is a lengthy list of collected evidence to support what > > I presume is your contention that Mr. Storms often doesn't > > know what he's talking about. How much more of your finite > > resources do you plan to spend on the furtherance of this goal? > > End the end, what will you have accomplished?
> "Talk is based upon the assumption that you can get somewhere > if you keep putting one word after another." - Iblis Ginjo Onc can interpret the context Gino's comments in several ways. Two interpretations are: (1) Me putting "one word after another" is nothing more than meaningless prattle. (2) By putting "one word after another" your goal will be to suggest that Mr. Storms often doesn't know what he is talking about. I'm sure there are additional interpretations. I'm aware of the fact that you are well known in many circles (certainly more known than I), and that you have performed CF experiments. There is a photo of you in the lenr-canr.org web site that shows you explaining experimental results to an attendee of the ICCF-10 Conference. See: http://lenr-canr.org/Collections/ICCF10.htm I sincerely hope the fruits of your CF analysis will eventually bare fruit if they haven't already, for all of our sake. It seems to me that you might increase your chances of realizing the fruits of your labor if more time was spent explaining and clarifying the conclusions of your experiments as compared to focusing on a personal assumption that Mr. Storms doesn't always know what he is talking about. Granted, it's only my personal opinion but I don't think it reflects well on you. Regards, Steven Vincent Johnson www.OrionWorks.com
