I have found it impossible to have a discussion with Dr. Swartz because
no matter what is said, he will not change his mind. Nevertheless, for
those people who read Vortex, Jed and I have no business relationship.
The website is a mutual effort for the benefit of the scientific
community. It is not a company. Saying that the website is misnamed is
just as pointless as for me to say that Dr. Swartz is misnamed. Also,
the charge of censorship, which Swartz is obsessed with, is getting very
old. Both Jed and I have told Swartz that anything he submits to the
website will be placed on the website. We have no reason to censor his
work. In addition, if he knows of any paper that is not on the site,
which he thinks should be, he only needs to send a copy to Jed.
Ed
Mitchell Swartz wrote:
At 08:35 AM 9/17/2005, Jed Rothwell wrote:
Mitchell Swartz writes:
"Furthermore, some present day cold fusion devices can produce more
excess power (several watts), even though in the hands of Dr. Storms
and Jed Rothwell and their company . . ."
Storms and I do not have a company. I have no connection to the
company that Storms works with. .....
"Storms and I do not have a company."
ROTFLOL. With all due respect, this is a laughable attempt at
'plausible deniability'
when in fact Storms and Rothwell are (and have long been) long-linked at
their hips,
for example at the (misnamed) LENR site - which is a company.
As but one (1) example, an admission was seen when it was revealed that
the late Eugene Mallove
was irritated about their systematic censorship at the (misnamed) LENR
site.
In response, Jed admitted, "It is our web site".
"Subject: Storms/Rothwell censorship
'This is known as science by politics -- it is disgusting. Storms
doesn't have leg to stand on and he knows it." - - Gene'"
Rothwell: "Storms and I disagree, obviously. It is our web site, not
Gene's, so we get to decide."
============
[Mon, 23 Aug 2004, [email protected], Re: LENR-CANR editorial policy;
underlined for emphasis]
Nor is this 'plausible deniability' apparently isolated. Rather, it
appears to be their SOP.
Similarly, Ed Storms also has a history of claiming he 'works alone'
even when others have given him money, support and equipment.
For example, confer:
"Dr. Storms is not currently engaged in research in this field as a
"solitary endeavor" nor is he a "lone garage scientist"
nor is he a "lone scientist" working on his own. ...."
http://www.makezine.com/03/interview/
Q.E.D.
"Overly organized research is confining, and guaranteed to
produce nothing new" - Tio Holtzman
