Wesley,

Given that liquid air can be produced safely in a vehicle owner's garage, and given that liquid air, due to the efficiency of heat pumps (COP =4) costs no more to produce that highly compressed air - maybe less, and is safer for vehicle occupants in the event of an accident, uses a lighter tank, has higher energy density, and so on.... why is an "air car" (i.e. highly compressed air as opposed to liquid air) preferable?

Obviously this is playing 'devil's advocate' - but can you counter these arguments in favor of liquid air ?

Jones

Reply via email to