|
Thanks for all the contributions: Swartz, Storms, Rothwell, Wesley
Bruce. I shall follow the leads and have changed my view about CF. I don’t
agree with the mechanisms Storms suggested such as a charge shielded nucleons –
that’s just plain wrong or ‘conversion of a deuteron to a wave’
what’s that mean to mean? Novel neutral particles?. Although when the experiments work you claim up to 200%
excess power, this might be dismissed as inaccuracy or a chemical reaction. For
the later I just can’t see how this could run for hours or weeks or more
the heat after death effect. I’m not prepared to believe that you can all
be lying; the other options are mass delusion (possible history of science) or
incompetence. All contentious. Anyway with no other means of communication than
word-of-mouth, seeing is believing and I will try to catch up with a CF meeting.
Just don’t make out that CF is the only game in town and be appreciative that
others with limited resources and man-power are making huge strides too. Also they
must, by principle, play by the rules. I really
must get this bit of administration I’m doing done. Thanks. ………………………………… Website ………………………………… |
