Vorts:

Ordinarily, I would not normally respond to either Ed Storms or Jed Rothwell because we are too busy doing cold fusion science and engineering, but because Dr. Storms continues his foolishness and disingenuity, a response IS in order.

So, vorts, (and seekers of truth), there are two sides; and here are the facts:

1. The issue is not about censorship of papers, but it is about the systematic censorship of ICCF-10 titles by Storms and Rothwell,
   while purporting they are the "official" ICCF-10 site.

2. The issue #1 appears to have arisen because Edmund Storms apparently plagiarized some of our work demonstrating very low level excess heat on contaminated platinum cathodes (he learned this generation of materials produced very low level
excess heat -what he later called 'crud'- while he attended LENR-2 in Texas).
Storms thereafter apparently used his imposed egregious censorship to cover it up, rather than simply citing prior art. Confirming this, we have obtained a video of him receiving this information prior to his becoming the second "first discoverer". [Hence, in this light are Storms' vituperative odious endless attacks. In fact, Storms' recent disputed claim to have been a 'lone inventor' in the recent MAKE magazine also corroborates his sociopathology and disingenuity. "Dr. Storms is not currently engaged in research in this field as a "solitary endeavor" nor is he a "lone garage scientist" nor is he a "lone scientist" working on his own. ...." http://www.makezine.com/03/interview/ ]

3. The issue is not about "infighting", but about the simple fact that Storms and Rothwell attack anyone with whom
they disagree (and some with whom they agree).

4. The issue is not simply about their inaccuracy but also about the fact that when Rothwell and Storms are directed to NOT publish something, they do anyway (as in Rothwell's recent post) again proving that neither can be trusted. [Storms recent disputed claim to have been a 'lone inventor' in the recent MAKE magazine also corroborates this. "Dr. Storms is not currently engaged in research in this field as a "solitary endeavor" nor is he a "lone garage scientist" nor is he a "lone scientist" working on his own. ...." http://www.makezine.com/03/interview/ ]

Finally, we (and I) have never worked with Ed Storms and so his childish ad hominems arise only from his own mind, in part created precisely because of his past plagiarism and other "problems" some of which become intermittently obvious when he endlessly attacks the President of the United States and America's allies, even while America struggles in War. [ Makes one wonder how many Los Alamos hard drives are missing, and how many secrets have been leaked?]

We have truly tried to move on repeatedly, but Ed Storms keeps coming back to this matter attempting to rewrite what happened.

  Hope that helps clarify what is really going on.

     Dr. Mitchell Swartz

==============================================================================================


At 01:36 PM 9/19/2005, you wrote:
I hope you notice that this issue is very one sided. I have no problem with Swartz other than he can not carry on what I consider to be a useful discussion of either his work or of the issue he considers to be censorship. His main problem with me has been my disagreement with his interpretation of his work. Such difference of opinion is natural and is generally resolved by an objective, unemotional discussion, which Swartz does not seem willing to undertake. As a result, I avoid further interaction - being busy doing more productive work and discussions with other people. I hope this makes my position more clear. I'm sure you know of people in your life with whom you have the same problem. Normally, such problems do not reflect on the subject of the conflict, which seems to be the case here with respect to cold fusion.

Regards,
Ed

[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

Yeah, what's this Storms Swartz Rothwell thing. Can you have it out and tell
us just what it is you don't like about each other? It's intriguing. Can you
act like grown ups for the younger crowd?
I guess some people are born never to get along.
NO SOLUTION :)
-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Alex Caliostro
Sent: 19 September 2005 17:46
To: [email protected]
Subject: infighting
i don't see how you will ever convince the doe to fund cold fusion if you can't get along
maybe we should all honor this day, me maties
http://www.talklikeapirate.com/piratehome.html
or maybe we need a new religion
http://www.venganza.org/
or both
http://www.venganza.org/sightings/index.htm
_________________________________________________________________
Express yourself instantly with MSN Messenger! Download today - it's FREE! http://messenger.msn.click-url.com/go/onm00200471ave/direct/01/


Reply via email to