Re: It ain't fittin, not fittin, it just ain't fittin

[Jones Beene]

Ok then, Richard, how about "retrofittin' "   ??   As in retrofittin' diesels. Are you running any large diesels 24/7 on any of your water projects?   How would you like to use 30-60% less fuel - as these French folks claim they are doing ? http://perso.wanadoo.fr/quanthommesuite/imagesreal05/fichespadapte.pdf   This is in French, but there are several thousand universal words-worth of pictures of same: http://perso.wanadoo.fr/quanthommesuite/RealPMCPantone.htm   The middle row of pictures based G1-4 are the diesel. The others are for smaller conversions. The average seems to be about 50/50 water - for the same power, but the actual testing is suspect.   However, given that a 24/7 diesel can burn $50,000 (or far more) worth of (untaxed) fuel per year, it might be worthwhile to inquire.   Pantone is having a few legal probelms but is apparently out of the pokey now. Anyway most of this material is in the public domain and you would be wise to waty away from him. http://pesn.com/2005/09/19/9600169_Pantone_Legal_Battles/   Joens