Jed Rothwell wrote: > Harry Veeder wrote: > >>> How much more evident can we make it? >> >> I was referring to the home page and not to the disclaimers on the papers. > > Ah. Well. Most people read the papers and skip the site. Anyway, I do not > see anything on the site that says it is official. > > >> You ask how much more evident can you make it? >> State it explicitly on the home page. > > State what, exactly? What wording do you propose? Where would you put it?
You could provide links to official sites on the home page, making it clear that they are official. > There are millions of web sites about various subjects, and hundreds of > thousands about energy. I do not recall seeing a disclaimer on one that > says it is not an official site, because that is self-evident. Do you see > any disclaimers on Swartz's site? How about Infinite Energy, or > http://www.newenergytimes.com/? Swartz should consider it as well. > When these other sites declare themselves unofficial (unofficially what, I > do not know) perhaps I will follow suit. > If LENR-CANR said: "The U.S. Department of Energy in cooperation with The > American Nuclear Society presents LENR-CANR.org . . ." that would certainly > look official, and it would be deceptive. It might be fun to add a fake > endorsement supposedly written by Robert Park. ("Authoritative, convincing > and complete . . .") But I see nothing like that. > Another possibility is to start a new official web site with a new name.
