At 03:31 PM 9/20/2005, Jed Rothwell wrote:
Mitchell Swartz wrote:
In addition, note that Rothwell has also finally admitted that HE removed
the titles,
but he remains disingenuous about WHEN he removed the titles.
Rothwell: Yo: Mitch. Where does "admit" come from? It is my web site. Who
else could have removed the titles? And who put them back as soon as you
asked? Let us get something straight there.....
Rothwell finally admitted several things after many years of denial.
Methinks he protests too much.
=====================================
Rothwell: You, of all people, should not spout off about the ethics of
running a web site. You have plagiarized my papers many times. In your
last issue you copied Coviello and Krivit in one place, and Storms and I
in another, both without attribution or permission.
What utter nonsense.
When we print, or discuss, excerpts from the web (publicly posted) we
cite source (and often the URL).
And we list the author. To take excerpts from public sites on the Internet
and then attribute authorship, origin, and URL is NOT plagiarism.
But then using a dictionary is NOT, and has NEVER BEEN, Mr. Rothwell's
strong point.
Despite Rothwell's BS, we have meticulously cited sites, URLS, and the
author, including Rothwell's in each case.
If Rothwell really knows of one we missed, he should let us know and that
will be corrected,
unlike the chronic failure to correct things which so characterizes Mr.
Rothwell and his company.
