I did not like the fact that permission to use my name was not sought by Cold Fusion Times. They rewrote the article ever so slightly and never asked me, the original author, if I was satisfied with what they had done to my piece. Also no permission was sought or credit given to the article owner, New Energy Times. Like this would ever fly in the mainstream media? Newsweek could fire all their writers and just rehash stories that appear in Time and U.S. News and World Report, and not even give credit to the other organizations or seek permission of the writers to use their names on the modified stories.

I see this Cold Fusion Times incident as plagiarism, because they reprinted a story without permission. Using my name is inconsequential, because permission was never granted to use my name on their piece in the first place. If he was just rehashing public Internet postings, as claimed, why even include my name on it?

The whole thing stinks. This is not how professional journalism outfits operate.

----- Original Message ----- From: "Jed Rothwell" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[email protected]>
Sent: Tuesday, September 20, 2005 10:15 PM
Subject: Re: Plagarism By Cold Fusion Times


Well, this certainly is bad form, but since the Cold Fusion Times version does show that John Coviello is the author, I do not think it is plagarism. It is a copyright violation.

- Jed




Reply via email to