In order to re-load the Matrix of free-energy.... on a healthy heaping grass-guzzling word salad... and with a double serving of window dressing, no-less.... there is this:
 
"You can’t measure anything in a *Holofractaline Model* because everything is simultaneously becoming local at different rates, and everything is alot of variables...why chaos is the only math you need to know..."
 
.... yes, it is a magnoficent piece of verbiage floating around in cyberspace these days, written by an anymous contributor. But wait ! as Ron Popeil of vege-matic fame (and no stranger to word-salad) might implore: There is more! Much more!
 
After reading this GUT-wrencher, the reason that authorial-anonimity is fervently desired will be abundantly clear to all, but for me it is a quaint treasure of misbegotten humor, la-ti-dah punnage and more - certainly worthy of incorporation into the vortex archive.
 
In fact there are a few instances of wisdom herein, interspersed with such fundamental apothegms as "Without entropy, negentropy wouldn’t be possible, " but all-in-all a jolly-good read unless you have better things to do. If that is the case, be sure to print it out first - as you never know when the TP has run out....
 
Can anyone divulge the name of the author? ... I don't think it is the Baron, as he would take credit, but maybe "Nora Baron" doing a totally tongue-in-cheek counter-spoof ??? Anyway, enjoy !
 
 
 
 
The Laws of Negentropy in Macro and Micro Scales in a VSL Multiverse
                                                    Or
                               An esoteric approach to the truth
 

The Physics Community produces a schism between old and new every time an experiment is conducted and contradictory results proven. Compensatory equations, revision and clutter result. While continuous theory and experiment continue this pattern with no regard for the careers founded on outdated models there are a few people who take it upon themselves to associate results across disciplines to recognize redundancy or corroborative phenomena. This presents a problem both to old ideas/careers and those who do the association.
 
Unresolved issues of paradox, anomalies, and redundancy prohibit a truly comprehensive Theory of Everything. Compounding this is of course an established physics paradigm funded by industry interests as opposed to humanitarian interests who have reason to be threatened by new data and speculation. Attempts to denounce new data and speculation as human fault are made in futility as there is technically never a consensus on which to base an argument in the first place, further, the paradox present in so many disciplines should be evidence enough that nobody can ever be wrong or right.
 
This being said let us look at why free energy is both possible and impossible in the context of the first laws:
 
Energy can neither be created or destroyed;
For every action there is an equal and opposite reaction.
 
The question of Perpetual Motion, Free Energy, or OverUnity is the primary question in physics even though it is being asked in a hundred ways.  Free Energy as a functional device is not only a useful product it is experimental proof for the GUT. We Approach the GUT now through particle accelerators which don’t necessarily reproduce natural phenomena, we observe the cosmos with eyes and machines which can only be synchronous or entrained to one dimension at a time, we observe non-local, non-linear phenomena only to record them in local, linear time and space.
 
To speculate about hyperdimensional physics is considered unscientific because of the great leaps one must make beyond the confines of an observer. This role of an observer is undeniable but is undermined by the stigma of metaphysics. What is the source of novelty in the world of humans? It is not dwelling on the known that’s for sure. Novelty is conserved within the association of variables of what is known; The great interdependency of nature assures that all may associate with all, that self-similarity is hidden beneath the constant change…so to question the validity of a free energy experiment based on its source, the human mind, is ridiculous. The Physics establishment insists that science be based on known observed phenomena not some delusional fancy. If not for rogue scientists who recognize themselves as experimental proof, we would be living in a flat terracentric universe where men cannot fly.
 
A variable speed of light or VSL Multiverse is a deliberately redundant term. The UNIverse of linear time and mass (or to Bohm, the Explicate Order) is also a MULTIverse of several dimensions fractured and enfolded into the UNIverse. We observe the UNIverse but are able to extrapolate the mechanics of hyperdimensional space mathematically. Our biology is biased towards the Explicate but our mind CAN BECOME BIASED TOWARDS THE SUPER/IMPLICATE. Mind has been proven to be non-local as well as local. This proof is anecdotal because as is the case with ZPE the experimental proof is too self referential to yield positive or negative results. You can’t measure anything in a *Holofractaline Model* because everything is simultaneously becoming local at different rates, and everything is alot of variables...why chaos is the only math you need to know...
 
“They” say the bulk of the universe exists as dark/mirror matter/energy that can’t be observed, they also say there was a big bang and the universe will fade into a homogenous thing void of movement and therefore form.
 
So this is the mainstream physics stance: that something they can’t see is going to disappear…I don’t know, that just doesn’t sound very scientific. Oh wait, they probably meant that the part of the universe we observe will disappear, silly me…
 
The whole question of free energy actually does hinge on this premise.
 
We must OBEY the KNOWN “laws” of physics or we are pseudo-science hobbyists and delusional, unofficial proponents.
 
So lets begin with a simple law I just made up: “Time is relative to the mass of the observer”
 
Prove it.
 
What is time? What is relative? What is mass? What is an Observer? Is to the, of the?
 
Grammatical Equations
 
What = ZPE
Is = Asymetry from ZPE
To The= movement, difference
Of The = closed system
 
Pronounciation = Time
Syntax = relativity
What is = Mass
An = Paradox – object/observation – is to - words/language
???? = Observer
 
 
We are the description of our  process and that is the process which we are
 
So a free energy device must not obey negentropic laws instead of entropic laws, but rather become biased towards the negentropic aspect of the singular law.
 
Find the self-similarity under all this novelty, find the scale invariant phenomena…
 
“The Speed of light is actually a measure of the mass of the observer, not velocity”
 
“Nothing attains velocity until it is observed, because until then it is locked into the uncollapsed Simulverse”
 
“All dipoles are two superpositioned monopoles/singularities, one is naked and omnipresent, its called the Zero Point Manifold, the other is a quantum dot, closed string, white hole, plank unit, etc,…that is clothed in linear time.”
 
“The transition point between Newtonian Physics and Quantum Physics is not scale because if it was we would know that specific wavelength by now, no, the difference is in your professional status and mine- the GUT accounts for our differences so how can they be seen as differences…?”
 
We impose difference in the same phenomena because that is our function as observers.
 
When we observe ourselves we find self-similarity.
 
Yes order decays into chaos, but order emerges from chaos a whole lot more.
 
Hyperspace bleeds order into the fractures of the manifold, we are the perpetual scab on the wounds (or origin ratios of interference) of the membranes. 
 
Rip heal rip heal rip heal rip heal rip heal rip heal rip heal…galaxies flying apart from eachother to make room on the event horizon…Just because I have dandruff doesn’t mean my scalp will disappear…and just because the flakes don’t reassemble into another scalp doesn’t mean they won’t millions of years from now.
 
So the laws of entropy, so emphasized by many as dominant, is not a law of decay but simply half of a law of change.
 
Actually, as Schauberger stated one half must have a natural bias and that it must be the implosive, ordering, cooling negentropic half; this is the bias of the whole towards hyperspace’s dark/mirror open dimensions.
 
The cycle is fully visible from the POV of a metacluster of galaxies and in the energy bands of atoms.
 

Macro to Micro
 
Non-local transmission of inertia to/from galactic cores, nuclei intercepted via Alfven pulses. Approach speed of light at precisely the same moment they reach the center. Core fractures energy according to origin ratio and reverse quantum foam coarsening rules.
 
Complexification, Stellation, aggregation
 
Micro to Macro
 
Scalar gradient shears off event horizon and Alfven waves bifurcate into twin photon  along strange attactor – event horizon  shears off  Gravity wells and Alfven waves bifurcate into twin star systems along spiral arms
 
Scale Invariant
 
Self orbiting spheres pump the strange attractor into arching plasma filaments.
 
Filaments absorb surface area of the ZPM and the space around the filaments relaxes and draws out the power of the nuclei, feedback iteration….
 
Accretion of plasma mirror, perpendicular interference now possible Entropy Attractor Enabled.
 
Iteration…
 
Without entropy, negentropy wouldn’t be possible.
 
The reason free energy is possible is because energy is really surface area and the only difference between open and closed systems is time. We can borrow energy/surface area from far away right now and it will be filled in again before we actually do it.

Reply via email to