Ron,

This is a good point about the very egregious and sloppy work done by M. Mann. Having a strong bias or believe is NOT an excuse for out-and-out dishonesty, no matter how valid you under-lying cause may be - "lying" being the operative word.

I say this even though, like Nick Palmer and others (who may have been led to this forum because they are looking for solutions), it seems clear that we could be facing an incredible environmental crisis due to overuse of fossil fuels. Unfortunately the proof is in the eye of the beholder, and there does not exist the kind of Hollywood-style dramatic (and falsified) evidence which Mann concocted - it is mostly statistical and interpretive (unless you have lived in Alaska for years and can see the evidence of melting glaciers out your front window every morning)... and we should admit that up front, for the benefit of those who doubting Thomases who want to see the bloody palm. You need to go North for that kind of first "hand" evidence.
 
There are other good studies which indicate, but not prove this warming hypothesis to be the case, but the biggest point that should be made from any of it - is to err on the side of caution. Here is a fairly balanced analysis of the biggest problem IMHO which is an arctic methane release, but of course, not everyone agrees as to the exact details and time frame:
http://www.gl.rhbnc.ac.uk/staff/pdf/SuddenMethaneLGM.pdf
 
The evidence for global warming is certainly MUCH stronger in the Arctic - and that is the point that many overlook. This is the problem area - every doubter who wants to become and activist for "more-of-the-same" should have a guided tour of any area in the far North by a native.

When a fool like Mann has been caught in such a pattern of deceit, this does incredible harm to those many other scientists who have done good work and come to the same conclusions, but without the kind of dramatic non-evidence which has been largely concocted here.

Shame on you Michael Mann. You have done the cause a great dis-service.
 
Jones

Reply via email to