Yup. Old Michael Faraday's MHD idea for putting a magnetic
field across the Thames and getting a D.C. voltage between the top
and bottom will work for tap water, but, should do even better with
household
Ammonia water run through a rectangular plastic conduit with nickel
electrodes
between a couple of Neodymium Super magnets.

Jones can Whoop-up--pee a working fluid too.
Saves trips to the John if his Pro-State is in good working order.   :-)

Fred


> [Original Message]
> From: Michael Foster <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: <[email protected]>
> Date: 10/28/05 1:11:30 PM
> Subject: RE: Micro comes to Water-power
>
>
> Jones wrote:
>
> > Magnetohydrodynamic methods can generate electricity 
> > through natural ionization in plain-old water. At the level of
> > the micro-channel, you do not even need to "split" the
> > water. This kind of process should make Fred Sparber
> > happy, as he has mentioned that the "natural" ionization of
> > H2O should be amenable to use on several occasions.
>  
> > Also it vaguely similar to the way an "ultraconductor"
> > works, if I am not mistaken.
>
> > BTW, If you want to get attention these days, just throw the
> > prefix "nano" in there, even where it doesn't belong. These
> > guys resisted the urge, even though they could have gotten
> > away with it, as arguably to get from the 1% eff. to a level
> > higher, one is going to need to go smaller:
>  
> >http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/technology/3201030.stm#graphic
>
> > The prototype battery generated 10 volts, and presumably it
> > requires pressurization, but that should be "free" from solar
> > energy.
>
> The only problem with this "new" discovery is that Michael
> Faraday did it ca 1840.  OK, so Mike used pond sediment
> pounded into a pipe one time and terracotta for "micro-channels"
> another time, still the same damn thing.  Neeno nano nyno
> noono.
>
> I've emailed these geniuses about this a few times, but 
> predictably got no response.  Might cost them their grant,
> hmm?
>
> I would do a lot of scientists a lot of good to read works
> actually written by Faraday, Maxwell, Lavoisier, Benjamin
> Franklin and so on.  You really learn a lot from reading the
> source as opposed to reading what others had to say about
> their work.
>
> M.
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Join Excite! - http://www.excite.com
> The most personalized portal on the Web!
>



Reply via email to