|
Everytime I think about ball lightning, I wonder if it could be related to
a larger version of the EVO of Ken Shoulders. Could there be two different
stability regimes for a massive number of temporarily bound-electrons (one
micron-range and one cm-range)?
Also there is that recurrent image of the "ball torus" which everyone
thinks at first glance is a sphere but it really is a torus in which the ID has
shrunk to zero, and the luminosity prohibits seeing the inner features at the
poles. The name for this shape is the "spherical toroid" and the newer Tokomak
designs also approach this shape.
This particular toroid shape you will recall is also present in the
"bubble" - which collapses in sonoluminescence. It is really not spherical at
all but toroidal.
Jones
... or maybe all this shape-musing is a further manifestation of the
earwig I been plagued by lately, thanks to Lucinda:
BTW, this reference to "VD"s in the cited article by Richard (Ball lightning being one of a number of
natural phenomena, which Dmitriev et al. refer to as “vacuum domains” or “VDs)
is an unfortunate acronym - as was the acronym "EV" before it was slightly
improved to "EVO" but is that a Russian or a Freudian slip?
It also reminds me of an old post of Fred about "Dark Suckers".
Electric bulbs which don't emit light; they suck dark. It is a funny
article and probably in the Vortex archives - and like so many things which show
up here - there is a hint of truth to it.
ERGO: Ball lightning could be both VD and
dark-sucker ;-)
Now I should just end it there... but as there is some punny
material in that aforementioned article (even if insightful), and as this is a
slow morning : then, speaking of VDs, and VDs-as-angels etc, and
"levity disks" and exploiting dark-suckers -
....I am trying hard not to mention Hugh Grant's old associate...
wasn't the name "Divine Brown" ...
|
- Re: Kiril Chukanov Jones Beene
- Re: Kiril Chukanov Grimer

