|
Jones and Steven,
Add me to the amazed list, also the first time I
have seen it. Notice the " qualifying" wording in the bottom half of the summary
of Widom and Larsen regarding " do not necessarily constitute evidence for the
direct fusion"
Richard
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Friday, November 11, 2005 10:18
AM
Subject: Re: NEW ENERGY TIMES -- Issue
#13
Jones,
From my view, your amazement is not without
basis.
My hunch is that in time, it will be seen that this "theory"
will be shown to be related to the work of many,many
people.
:)
Steve
At 06:45 AM 11/11/2005, you wrote:
NEW
ENERGY TIMES -- Issue #13
A most amazing
pdf is mentioned here:
http://www.arxiv.org/PS_cache/cond-mat/pdf/0505/0505026.pdf
I say "amazing" - because it sounds almost exactly like
the stimulus for the "heavy electron" of Widom and Larsen has been mentioned
here on vortex many times earlier - and indeed could be related to the
hypothetical lepton triad, electronium (*e-), of Frederick Sparber, instead
of the muon, which for months Fred and myself have tossed around like the
proverbial hot potato.
Not ot
mention the fact that the "ultra low momentum neutrons" which can induce
"chains of nuclear reactions" sound a lot like the "energy deficient
neutron" which we have mentioned often here as being related to an "n=1/137
hydino". The two idea are not incompatible.
This paper came out in May and this is the first time I
have seen it... honest... and if it is correct, well... let's just say it
ties in nicely with the idea of how electronium, or the hydrino/deuterino
would operate to produce cold fusion.
...hmm... sour cream or butter?
Jones
|
