I'm sorry, but, your source site:
http://thewebfairy.com
does not constitute what my management tends to call a "reliable
source". I direct you to the ASCE who, while agreeing that the study
is not conclusive, consider the "long slow fire" explanation credible.
You might wish to consider embrittlement of the structure after long
exposure to the hydrocarbon fire.
BTW, thermite accelerant would be detectable even today.
-----Original Message-----
From: Jones Beene <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [email protected]
Sent: Mon, 21 Nov 2005 14:55:46 -0800
Subject: Re: BYU. professor thinks bombs, not planes, toppled WTC
Hi,
The fires of WTC-7 are not of "unknown origin". There was the >
matter of 50,000 gallons of diesel fuel stored in the basement > not
far from the power substation large enough to run a small > city.
Yes. but these tanks were below ground level and even so, if every drop
had burned, the building should have survived.
The FEMA official analysis is still "unknown origin."
Here are the very important case-studies of 5 similar fires in
high-rises, which had more fuel (also from diesel substations), burned
longer, and did NOT fall. Go about 4/5 down this page:
http://thewebfairy.com/killtown/wtc7/fire.html
J.
After the main course, go here for your appetizer:
http://thewebfairy.com/killtown/wtc7/pullit.html
___________________________________________________
Try the New Netscape Mail Today!
Virtually Spam-Free | More Storage | Import Your Contact List
http://mail.netscape.com
