Rick Monteverde writes:

I suspect that the acoustic output is ordinary and isn't any more beam-like than any sound at that frequency.

There is ongoing R&D of coherent acoustic phonon generation in piezoelectric semiconductors
http://arxiv.org/abs/cond-mat/0301031

and optical phonon pumping
http://flux.aps.org/meetings/BAPSMAR95/abs/SR1803.html

which muddies the difference between light and sound in the infrared and terahertz ranges. There is a definite overlap in the terahertz range which has applicability to LENR. This is not visible light but is arguably "light" in that it can be both photonic and phononic. I guess that is what Richard was refering to.

...and, yes, the same kind of beam-like effect might be possible with phonons- but only in specialized homogenous materials - as air likely would scatter waves too much. Unlike photons, which do not "need" air to propagate, phonons need mass in order to propagate... hey... isn't that why the idea of "aether" originated in the first place?

(legends of acoustic stone levitation not withstanding)

... there may be a grain of truth in many legends, but that one demands a high degree of supension of disbelief.

It might be called an AASER - acoustic amplification (by) stimulated emission (of phonon) radiation. Needs a better acronym though.

One term now in use is "Saser". This paper calls it a "phaser" but Star Trek got there first on that one:
http://arxiv.org/abs/cond-mat/0402640

Jones

BTW I posted earlier some ideas on a related issue (LENR) before. Esp in re: the "Letts/Cravens experiment" (which used a laser). The gist of that is a "triple coherency" overlapping range may have special synergy for LENR.

The "triple" levels of wave overlap envisions terahertz level waves of:
1) light (photon)
2) sound or heat (phonon)
3) EM  (magnetic but not photonic as in a pulsing magnetic field)

Actually the last one is a bit confusing - but envisions a static magnetic field which does not change in bulk properties - but which is virtually "pulsed" at the nano-level by 1) and 2) interacting with 3).




Reply via email to