Harry -

I did the vacuum experiment years ago so details are a little hazy, but
basically it was a jar with a small diameter (1/8" I.D. I think)tube
sticking through the lid. Inside the jar was a small airfoil section
made of modelling clay, suspended vertically with the tube pointing at
the front/top surface. Basically like the spoon/faucet setup, but with
an air jet instead of a faucet. Vacuum pump is high capacity relative to
the small air inlet capacity, so when allowing air to flow in through
the tube, the vacuum still stays fairly high - so all the significant
air action is just the flow hitting the top side of the foil. The foil
pulls into the airflow, just like the spoon in a water flow. And I'm
pretty sure, mitigated by the absence of any real measurement, that the
pressure on the top of the foil was mostly higher than on the bottom.

- Rick

-----Original Message-----
From: Harry Veeder [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Tuesday, December 06, 2005 5:43 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: OT: Secrets of bee flight revealed


Rick Monteverde wrote:

> Harry -
> 
> I think the wedge effect is the bulk of a real wing's lift. Concurrent

> with running a wedge through material, you get pressure differential. 
> But the cause of the differential is not from faster flow above than 
> below the curve, etc., it's just a wedge piling up compressible 
> material on its underside. Contributing also is reaction mass as I've 
> described, but I can't guess the proportion, and it no doubt varies 
> with reynolds number - but I think its usually significant. Lastly is 
> viscous drag on the reaction mass heading downward. I suspect that's 
> the smallest component on steady-state wings and may be costly in 
> terms of power spent, but comprises a large lift component in cyclic 
> wings. OIW "lift" is a composite from several sources in different 
> proportions depending on wing shape, angle of attack, Reynolds number,

> etc.
> 
> Agreed?
> 


Almost.... I did the spoon-under-the-faucet experiment and it is very
persuasive.

However, could you please describe your apparatus with the vacuum pump
in more detail. I am not intending to replicate the experiment, but  I
would like to know how you detected a lifting force.

Thanks,

Harry





Reply via email to