What I find most interesting is that Elforsk, Gullstrom and Dr. Myron Evans have begun corresponding…
Go to this site and do a search for LENR: https://drmyronevans.wordpress.com/ https://drmyronevans.files.wordpress.com/2012/08/a226thpaper.pdf https://drmyronevans.wordpress.com/2012/08/22/for-posting-uft226-sections-1-and-2/ https://drmyronevans.wordpress.com/2012/08/22/for-posting-background-notes-to-uft226/ Evans’ opinion about where fizzix took a wrong turn… “QED and QCD have their hidden adjustable parameters and their unobservables (virtual particles). They are not precise theories at all, and they are plagued with artificially removed infinities (renormalization). With the benefit of forty years of experience in chemical and theoretical physics I think that QED was a wrong turning entirely.” -mark iverson From: Bob Cook [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Wednesday, December 03, 2014 9:34 PM To: [email protected] Subject: Re: [Vo]: Neutron Tunneling Theory regarding Lugano Report-- Mats Lewan in a revised addition to his book on Rossi earlier this year has added a comment about a paper from Carl-Oscar Gullström. He mentions that Carl-Oscar Gullström’s paper, “Low Radiation fusion through bound neutron Tunneling” got some positive attention from Bo Höistad, one of the authors of the Lugano report who told Mats: “It is very interesting. It fits like a glove with our results, both the isotopic changes and the absence of radiation. It is the first time that I see a scenario that could explain the results—it has not existed before!” The paper can be found form E-Cat World here: http://www.scribd.com/doc/244393652/Low-radiation-fusion-through-bound-neutron-tunneling This may be the answer to the Rossi effect that the Swedes are looking for. Carl-Oscar is a student at Uppsala University-- Bravo, Bob Cook
