Kevin O'Malley <[email protected]> wrote: Joshua Cude managed to dismantle the claim of 14,720 replications. > > http://ecatnews.com/?p=2669&cpage=14#comment-76884 > > popeye Reply > <http://ecatnews.com/?p=2669&cpage=14&replytocom=76873#respond> > > December 15, 2014 at 4:43 pm > > Kevmo wrote: > > JT He of the Chinese Academy of Sciences says 14,720 times… > > Your link for this doesn’t work, but I found the article (Front. Phys. > China (2007) 1: 96―102 ). And in it is given a table claiming 14,720 as an > “estimated number of experiments performed”. Not positive results, let > alone replications of anything specified. . . . > 1. Most of them are positive.
2. Many others are not reported. 3. There have been plenty of others after that. 4. Even 1 positive result proves beyond question that Cude is full of shit. 5. This entire discussion is ridiculous. Who cares exactly how many? It makes no difference. 14,000 or 7,000 or 700 would be more than enough to prove it is real, and that -- in turn -- proves that Cude is wrong. - Jed
