Unfortunately, I don't think you can say 'scientist' without providing context.
There is a wide gap between someone who has been primary author on peer reviewed papers in credible journals that have been cited by other peer reviewed scientists and someone who has not. Unfortunately, looking at Research Gate, this fellow falls in the latter category. I hope this turns out to be real and I hope the reason why Rossi editted his comment from "I do not know the particulars, therefore cannot comment, but it is normal that the so called “Rossi Effect”" to "I do not know the particulars, therefore cannot comment, but it is possible that the so called “Rossi Effect” is replicable after the data published in the Report of Lugano." was because he realized this guy doesn't appear to be credible. Anyways, I want to believe like everyone else, but I just don't find this guy credible at all. On Sat, Dec 27, 2014 at 6:23 AM, Jed Rothwell <[email protected]> wrote: > See: > > > http://www.e-catworld.com/2014/12/27/lugano-confirmed-replication-report-published-of-hot-cat-device-by-russian-researcher-alexander-g-parkhomov/ >
