James Bowery <[email protected]> wrote: Its not clear that he owes everything to Fleischmann & Pons. >
His first experiments were electrochemical with nickel, similar to F&P's experiments with Pd. As I recall, he said he was prompted to do them by the reports of cold fusion. He also repeatedly claimed that he can explain cold fusion based on his theory. Now he says cold fusion is "bogus" and the researchers are "very poor at science, self deluded, or dishonest." You do not need his theory to explain "bogus" results, do you? You don't need any theory. You just dismiss them. You toss them out, along with the laws of thermodynamics and calorimetry going back to Lavoisier. All wrong. Hundreds of world class experts from hundreds of major laboratories are all very poor at science. Who knew that National Labs and places like BARC were staffed by such dunderheads? Even if his theories prove right, personally he is yet another tiresome, arrogant fool. - Jed
