Hello Jones Therefore I added the word almost. “Nobodies” :No ofcourse that is not what i meant. You and Meulenberg are certainly promoting the idea of DDL`s. In my last post which i just sended I left the word “almost” out bcs i couldnt find any quantum physicist in the Netherlands who wanted to look into it theory of R.Mills. I tried for about 10 years!
Peter From: Jones Beene Sent: Sunday, January 11, 2015 6:55 PM To: [email protected] Subject: RE: [Vo]:Re: QM rant From: [email protected] I couldnt agree more with what you say. It is really strange that almost nobody is looking into the theory of R.Mills. That is not correct. Several commenters here give Mills some credit - at least partial credit. But maybe we are “nobodies” so OK, no problem. Mills theory looks like a partial fit, but could be incomplete or partly inaccurate. For the record, I have been promoting the idea on this forum from day-one that both the Parkhomov and Rossi reactors are powered by hydrogen going into the DDL – or Deep Dirac Level. This is the Dark Matter state which has an emission line at 3.56 keV. There is no evidence of a nuclear reaction in Parkhomov. The DDL methodology is indeed similar to Mills,’ as it is a deep stable state - but it is based on Dirac. Muhlenberg and others have been promoters of parts of this mechanism, which is inspired by Mills but not Millsean. The version, or “refinement”, which I’m favoring - if it proves correct - depends on SPP formation to take the hydrogen all the way to the lowest ground state - by spin/spin interaction. Jones -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Deze email is gecontroleerd door CAIWAY Internet Virusvrij. Voor meer informatie, zie http://www.caiway.nl/
