*LENR is topological in nature. The size and shape of its components are as important as the kinds of material that supports it. The greater the conformance to LENR's ideal topological configuration, the greater will be LENR's productivity.*
*Nickel is the best metal to use for the Ni/H reactor because it is an almost perfect reflector of mid-infrared light. Some other metals are almost as good: titanium and zirconium. This ability to minimize dispersion of reflected infrared light is just what the Ni/H reactor needs to form Surface Plasmon Polaritons(SPP) at high efficiency. * *As the temperature of nickel rises above its Curie temperature, Nickel's global magnetic coherence breaks down and it becomes para-magnetic. What then forms on the surface of nickel are localized magnetic vortexes on the micro and nano-scale. This spin vortex nature of the nickel surface also aids in the production efficiency of SPPs.* *Since SPP's are spinning vortexes of an entangled light/matter waveform, these vortexes of spin on the surface of nickel aids in SPP formation. * *But nickel alone provides just a start to the strength of a good Ni/H LENR reaction. Like in the Ken Shoulder 's EVOs described above, nano-particles are were all the power comes from. This is why Rossi has stated that without his “secret sauce” the E-Cat is a poor performer. In the Hot Cat, for example, Lithium and Hydrogen produce nano-particles that carry the bulk of the strength of the LENR reaction. As in spark induced LENR and Hot-Cat meltdown, nano-particles that condense out of cooling plasma will carry the main portion of the SPP formation and associated power production.* *In closing, I predict that someone in the future will build an LENR metal vapor reactor that has a sustained operating temperature of 3000C ( a Hot-cat running in sustained meltdown mode). The challenge will be in controlling it. Let us be granted a life long enough to see such wonders occur.* On Sun, Jan 11, 2015 at 7:46 PM, Axil Axil <[email protected]> wrote: > To my tastes, Ken Shoulders ran the quintessential LENR experiment when he > photographed the development of what Ken called charge clusters (also > called exotic vacuum objects or EVOs). A spark had penetrated a sheet of > aluminum where an aluminum plasma was condensing into aluminum > nanoparticles resulting in the formation of two EV types, a bright one and > a dark one. > > Ken analyzed the magnetic field coming off the dark EV and he found that > this type of EV acts as a magnetic monipole. In subsequent years, > Nanoplasmonics pushed the analsys of these coherent balls of EMF further > and determined that their structure was actually solitons or frozen and > persistent EMF waveforms. > > The bright soliton is formed when a infrared photon and an electron from a > dipole match energies and become entangled. The Surface Plasmon Polariton > thus formed gets a spin of 1 from the photon and a greatly reduced mass of > one millionth of that of the electron. These almost massless complex > particles form a Bose Einstein Condensate at the drop of a hat. > > The dark soliton is more interesting and hard to understand. It is a > composite particle of a infrared photon and the :Hole” (lack of charge) in > the dipole. It has a positive charge and a spin of 2. I speculate that it > is this type of soliton that has been seen by Frederic Henry-Couannier when > he says: > > “If it succeeds to actually reach the metal it will recover neutrality > (catch free electrons around) and disappear ("evaporate") in a very short > time. But the mlb has also a huge magnetic moment so it could in principle > be trapped in a ferromagnetic material inside a zone with an appropriate > magnetic field configuration : this is probably what happens in Ni cracks > (NAE) “ > > For all those interested in the formation of dark solitons in cracks I > recommend this paper: > > Effects of Spin-Dependent Polariton-Polariton Interactions in > Semiconductor Microcavities: Spin Rings, Bright Spatial Solitons and > Soliton Patterns > > http://etheses.whiterose.ac.uk/3872/1/SICH_eThesis.pdf > > As the father of the crack theory of palladium LENR theory, I hope Ed > Storms reads this paper and takes it seriously. > > I like this paper because it contains a lot of words and not many > equations. To my mind, in this line of thought is where the truth of LENR > can be found > > On Sun, Jan 11, 2015 at 1:56 PM, Peter Gluck <[email protected]> > wrote: > >> Dear Friends, >> >> Just started to discuss how many LENRs exist and how much unity exists in >> diversity. >> Great LENR activity in Ukraine. >> >> >> http://egooutpeters.blogspot.ro/2015/01/lenr-census-how-many-species-exist.html >> >> More next week... >> >> Peter >> >> -- >> Dr. Peter Gluck >> Cluj, Romania >> http://egooutpeters.blogspot.com >> > >
