Axil, very nice relativistic theory – a little different than mine in that they are only talking about relativistic effects of a subatomic portion of a particle but I would be willing to accept it if it also explains the hydrino. If it scales to the atomic level than Naud’s proposal for the hydrino being relativistic hydrogen would be supported. What I don’t agree with was the syntax they used in your citation [snip] In a time dilation tradeoff, the lifetime of the elementary subatomic particle is lengthened to increase the energy of the particle.[/snip]. My issue as always is relativistic perspective –to get more energy in the particle at a macro scale you have to “age” the subatomic particle longer wrt to the rest of the particle. In Paradox twin the lifetime of the stationary twin appears lengthened wrt the near C twin but in this case of time dilation of a subatomic particle wrt an atomic particle the stationary /atomic macro perspective is slower than the time unit of the subatomic. When all the dust settles the researchers are going to realize they have finally built the theoretical foundations for catalytic action and the basis for Japanese patents on radioactive remediation by catalysts. IMHO the geometry segregates virtual particle density such that there can be areas where lifetime is lengthened instead of shortened just as the authors indicated but the whole syntax is bogus from the perspective of local observers who are always blissfully unaware time is being dilated faster or slower and lifetimes seem normal. We know that catalytic action accelerates reactions and that nano powder geometry is equivalent to the skeletal catalysts used by Mills – I think they assumed that because light propagation is slowed that time slowed in the particle as well but we should instead be viewing this as segregation where the dilation is also pushed in both directions along a certain axis and that lattice geometry allows these segregated regions to accumulate into the macro scale where we can measure the effects on photons and gas atoms.
Fran From: Axil Axil [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Friday, January 23, 2015 11:26 PM To: vortex-l Subject: EXTERNAL: Re: [Vo]:Waveform minipulation Waveform manipulation should read Waveform manipulation On Fri, Jan 23, 2015 at 10:59 PM, Axil Axil <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: Reference: http://phys.org/news/2015-01-analysis-self-propel-subatomic-particles.html Welcome to the new physics... We can manipulate the waveform of a stationary subatomic particle using a phase mask to increase its energy up to the speed of light. This process uses the theory of relativity to convert the stationary subatomic particle into a spread-out waveform with lots of energy applied against the size of the waveform. The size of the elementary particle as defined by the extent of its waveform is increased by time dilation where energy is increased by extending the tail defining the waveform of the elementary particle to satisfy the momentum conservation laws. In quantum mechanics, waves and particles are considered to be two aspects of the same physical phenomena. We can modify the properties of a subatomic particle by manipulating its waveform. In a time dilation tradeoff, the lifetime of the elementary subatomic particle is lengthened to increase the energy of the particle. The key to this manipulation of the waveform is the Phase mask. The specially prepared nanometer sized dimpled surface of the nickel micro particles in the Rossi reactor serves as a phase mast to accelerate stationary particles to a ultra high energy wave shapes in the particle's frame of reference but the particle remains stationary in the reactors frame of reference. In nanoplasmonics, it is the dark mode surface plasmon polariton that absorbs infrared photons. So the “hole” / photon hybrid of the dipole must be the subatomic waveform that is being modified to light speed even when it is embedded inside that nickel lattice of the surface of the micro particle. http://physics.aps.org/articles/v8/7 Big Twist for Electron Beam One question that was hanging in the magnetic theory of LENR causation was how a strong magnetic field could be produced by an irregular surface, I have just become aware of a potentially new spin (magnetic) amplification process that fits in well with the magnetic theory of LENR and helps explain how a properly formatted nano surface feature on a metal surface could lead to LENR. A beam of electrons rotating in a highly constrained vortex can have the strength of their spins multiplied by hundreds of times. These vortexes are produced by a surface mask where the waveform of the electron is modified by constructive and destructive interference. Just like a dipole where a vibrating electron is always paired with a hole, and every vortex has two ends, paired SPP has bright SPP paired with a dark SPP. It is the Dark SPP that is both magnetically and LENR active. For example, the wavelength of infrared light is about 700nm to 1000nm. If the vortex that the Hole/light hybrid is circulating around in is 1 just nanometer, the spin of the SPP is multiplied by 1000. A dark mode Surface Plasmon Polaritons (SPP) with a spin of 2 will have an effective spin of 2000 if rotating in a dimensionally small SPP vortex. In addition as described above, when the tail of the waveform of the electron or hole is expanded by the time dilation energy uncertainty principle trade off which accelerates stationary subatomic particles to the speed of light, even more spin multiplication will occur, how much...a lot. These two new quantum mechanical principles of condensed matter subatomic particle waveform manipulation can now explain where the huge strength of atomic level magnetism comes from.
