I will go through my primus in detail, one point after the other with references for your convenience.
First, stating my primus is simple terms as follows: There is more than one way to confine an electron. First, there is the way that most people know about, that is, an electron can orbit a nucleus. This is what R. Mills assums in his theory. There is another way for an electron to be confined, that is in a box, o in other words in a potential well. This is basically what is happening in cold fusion and reflected in R. Mills experimental results. Here is something to read about it. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Particle_in_a_box When you understand this concept we can go further... On Sun, Feb 1, 2015 at 10:54 AM, Orionworks - Steven Vincent Johnson < [email protected]> wrote: > Peter, > > > > I still don't know what to make of Randy's bold hydrino theory and whether > BLP will eventually be able to pull the magic rabbit out of the hat. I > don't have sufficient mathematical expertise to parse out all the complex > mathematical equations Randy has used in order to justify his position on > the matter. > > > > Sometimes I try to understand Axil's theoretical perspective. > Unfortunately I realize I haven't got a clue what he's trying to say > either, and most likely I never will. All I know is that Ed Storms seemed > to have his issues with some of Axil's theoretical perspectives. I believe > Storms often critiqued some Axil's perspectives as not being sufficiently > backed up with scientific evidence. Axil can correct me if I am mistaken, > but as best as I can parse it out Axil believes Randy has gotten > significant portions of his hydrino theory wrong and that he has ended up > creating his own imaginative universe filled with mythical hydrinos. > Meanwhile, I realize many others within the Vort Collective also appear to > voice various degrees and levels of criticisms of Randy's theory. There > also seem to be a few supporters who apparently believe Randy's theory > maybe more on the track than as compared to being the ramblings of a > deluded theoretician. So, it's par for the course. > > > > Over at SCP when the Cold Fusion topic occasionally came up I repeatedly > witnessed Randy trash the research, implying that most of the data is > either bogus or badly assembled. I recall Randy once posting that from his > POV the CF field seems to be filled with the equivalent of cult followers > which, ironically, is exactly what I see happening within the SCP group. > Don't get me wrong. I see a lot of smart objectively oriented people asking > difficult questions of the doctor. Some of them openly support CF and feel > the evidence collected IS valid, despite what Randy might conjecture. But > the group also has its stable of cheer leaders, and some of them can get > rather feisty at times when they feel their superhero has been trashed in > some way. > > > > It's not difficult for me to perceive Randy's critiques on CF news as > primarily a strategic and corporate one. I think he's basically saying: > Accept no other brand name other than our own. Every corporation does it in > the name of marketing. Unfortunately, such marketing strategies tend to be > incompatible with spirit of scientific inquiry, and there's not much we can > do about the matter. > > > > At present I am not surprised that the December deadline for a prototype > delivery has come and gone. It doesn't really concern me at this stage of > the game. If the delays drag on for another year to two, without sufficient > feedback and reasonable explanation from BLP, well that will be a > completely different story. As Jones has said many, many, MANY times > before. We have seen all this behavior before. > > > > I must confess that I was both irritated and also a little amused that > some minion over at SCP felt sufficiently compelled to inform me that my > repeated suggestions that BLP might first want to try to assemble an > experimental POC before assembling a commercial product was effectively > haranguing the good name of Dr. Mills and his hydrino theory. Fortunately, > it would appear that Dr. Mills didn't seem to have taken my repeated > suggestions personally. All I know is that it seemed to have taken repeated > postings on my part to finally get Randy to respond directly to my > suggestion. I'm glad I was persistent. I came away with the feeling that > Randy really didn't want to respond directly to my query. Meanwhile, some > of his minions took it personally. I don't give a crap what any SCP minion > might have to say on the matter other than to feel a tad irritated. > Fortunately, the SCP moderator graciously let me respond back. > > > > > https://groups.yahoo.com/neo/groups/SocietyforClassicalPhysics/conversations/messages/4663 > > > > Regards, > > Steven Vincent Johnson > > svjart.orionworks.com > > zazzle.com/orionworks > > >
