Eric Walker <[email protected]> wrote:
> That Gary Wright guy has it out for Rossi. > I think you mean he "has it in" for Rossi. He sure does! He seems like a fanatic. He is also terribly rude. He sent a long list of rude questions to Bo Hoisted. Hoisted answered with one question of his own: "Are you Steve Krivit?" Wright said he isn't. He sure sounds like Steve. (I cannot find that exchange, but it is on his web site.) Fortunately, Wright does not have it in for cold fusion. He would be a real pain in the butt if he did. From the website: "NOTE: The general field of Cold Fusion / Low-Energy Nuclear Reaction research is NOT a scam. For authoritative references on this field, see either New Energy Times, or mainstream encyclopedia references by Elsevier or John Wiley and Sons." > What are the typical legal ramifications under US state/federal law, if > any, for filing a complaint under a pseudonym? > I doubt there are legal ramifications. People can file complaints anonymously if they want. The authorities are free to ignore such complaints. There might be a problem if you were to file a complaint with statements you knew were lies. I would not know about that. Regarding the investigation itself, here is what I wrote to a friend: "I think it is laudable that the department takes things like this seriously and investigates. It does not sound like they spent a lot of time or money. If I were an official who heard about something like this, I would think it might be some amateur or a retired scientist playing games with radioisotopes. I think it is appropriate to send someone around with a Geiger counter." - Jed
