Boom! On Thu, Feb 5, 2015 at 10:38 AM, Lewan Mats <mats.le...@nyteknik.se> wrote:
> I contacted David Crowley, Manager of the Radioactive Materials Branch > at N.C. Department of Health and Human Services, and asked a few questions > about the document published by GW. > > > > Here’s his answer: > > > > - - - - - > > > > Mr. Lewan, > > > > The report posted to www.freeenergyscams.com is in fact a copy of an > original report from my office. Please note that the allegation number > should be labeled 2015-01 instead of 2014-01 because the investigation was > the first one finalized in 2015. Anything stated within the report > findings was in context to an allegation investigation of radioactive > material being utilized in North Carolina. > > > > The investigators documented what was said and observed. They reported > what was communicated to them by Mr. Vaughn, but left out additional > descriptive language that followed the statement of credibility. > > > > We have no further information to share about the alleger. > > > > Thank you for your inquiry. > > > > David Crowley > > N.C. Department of Health and Human Services > > Manager, Radioactive Materials Branch – Division of Health Service > Regulation > > 5505 Creedmoor Rd, First Floor, Raleigh, NC 27612 > > 1645 MSC, Raleigh NC 27699-1645 > > Phone: 919-814-2303 > > david.crow...@dhhs.nc.gov > > www.ncradiation.net > > www.ncdhhs.gov/dhsr/ > > > > - - - - > > Mats > > www.animpossibleinvention.com > > > > > > *Från:* Ian Walker [mailto:walker...@gmail.com] > *Skickat:* den 5 februari 2015 19:20 > *Till:* vortex-l@eskimo.com > *Ämne:* Re: [Vo]:Investigation by NC Department of Health into > IH/Rossi/Vaughn/etc > > > > Hi all > > As has been noted on Ecatworld in a post by US_Citizen71 > > http://www.e-catworld.com/2015/02/04/rossi-responds-to-publication-of-inspection-report/ > and as many thought from the disjointed ambiguous and odd phrasing in the > letter as well as missing pages, the letter appears to be a Photoshop job. > https://drive.google.com/file/d/0BxCBtZoq-VqLd1VOd3dVS2pRWGM/view > > Kind Regards walker > > > > On 5 February 2015 at 16:03, Jed Rothwell <jedrothw...@gmail.com> wrote: > > I wrote: > > > > I have no idea why J. T. Vaughn said what he said, but I expect he did > say it. I do not think he is the sort of person who lies. Perhaps they are > fed up with Rossi? > > > > I do not know who said what to whom, but let's go over this statement > again: > > > "Mr JT Vaughn stated .. that Mr Rossi did not appear credible (paraphrase)" > > Imagine an inspector from the State of South Carolina were to call me on > the phone and ask: "regarding this fellow Rossi, does he have any > credibility with the scientific mainstream?" I would say "no, he doesn't." > I might add that he has not published anything, he says controversial > things, and he has a checkered past. I think it is obvious to anyone that > he does not appear credible. > > > > I think some of Rossi's claims are probably true. Others I think are > exaggerated or mistaken. He certainly has a credibility problem. I was > hoping the second Elforsk test would settle the issue once and for all but > unfortunately I do not think it has. > > > > If Vaughn said something like that, I don't see how anyone can criticize > it. > > > > - Jed > > > > >
