Bizarre that they would think to hide behind an explosion shield -- which
is rational given prior pressure excursions -- but would not think to hook
up the pressure sensor.

On Fri, Feb 6, 2015 at 1:13 PM, Axil Axil <janap...@gmail.com> wrote:

> Bob Greenyer <https://disqus.com/by/bobgreenyer/>  Obvious
> <http://www.e-catworld.com/2015/02/06/live-video-feed-from-mfmp-feb-5th-experiments-planned/#comment-1838945044>
> • 40 minutes ago
> <http://www.e-catworld.com/2015/02/06/live-video-feed-from-mfmp-feb-5th-experiments-planned/#comment-1838958558>
>
> The pressure sensor was not connected. this can be seen visually. The core
> was shown in pictures earlier in the evening on Facebook.
>
> On Fri, Feb 6, 2015 at 1:58 PM, MarkI-ZeroPoint <zeropo...@charter.net>
> wrote:
>
>> Do you believe the sensor, or your eyes?
>>
>> -mi
>>
>>
>>
>> *From:* James Bowery [mailto:jabow...@gmail.com]
>> *Sent:* Friday, February 06, 2015 10:42 AM
>> *To:* vortex-l
>> *Subject:* Re: [Vo]:Dog Bone Project
>>
>>
>>
>> The pressure release hypothesis is inconsistent with the "PSI" read out
>> in the video, which never reaches 1.0.
>>
>>
>>
>> On Fri, Feb 6, 2015 at 12:39 PM, MarkI-ZeroPoint <zeropo...@charter.net>
>> wrote:
>>
>> At 2:29/2:30 into the short segment posted by Craig, it looks like the
>> right-side end-plug, or whatever is sticking out that end, blows out.  And
>> I use that term specifically since one also sees some hint of a pressure
>> release.  Whether that release is at an appropriate level is apparently
>> debatable...
>> -mark iverson
>>
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Orionworks - Steven Vincent Johnson [mailto:orionwo...@charter.net]
>> Sent: Friday, February 06, 2015 9:25 AM
>> To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
>> Subject: RE: [Vo]:Dog Bone Project
>>
>> Good show,
>>
>> Thanks, Craig.
>>
>> Regards,
>> Steven Vincent Johnson
>> svjart.orionworks.com
>> zazzle.com/orionworks
>>
>> > Short segment showing the explosion.
>>
>> > https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dDfRaDY2R_A&feature=youtu.be
>>
>> > Craig
>>
>>
>>
>
>

Reply via email to