Maybe submersing in water bath would help even temp profile

On Sunday, February 8, 2015, Bob Cook <frobertc...@hotmail.com> wrote:

>  I think the failure was caused by a brittle fracture of the alumina tube
> due to thermal stresses, internal micro stresses caused by micro bubble
> formation and resulting embrittlement.
>
> Bob
>
> Sent from Windows Mail
>
> *From:* Bob Higgins
> <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','rj.bob.higg...@gmail.com');>
> *Sent:* ‎Friday‎, ‎February‎ ‎6‎, ‎2015 ‎1‎:‎00‎ ‎PM
> *To:* vortex-l@eskimo.com
> <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','vortex-l@eskimo.com');>
>
> Ryan Hunt reports that the failure mode was NOT the compression fitting
> giving way under pressure - the fitting remained intact.  This experiment
> was of the "easier Parkhomov" design, posted previously where the seal was
> made with a compression fitting, in this case with the use of a soft
> aluminum ferrule at the suggestion of Alan Goldwater.  Alan's tests
> suggested the compression fitting would hold and it did!  Using the
> compression fitting is a real win because it completely avoids the
> problematic sealing of the ends with cement while providing an opportunity
> to instrument the reaction vessel.
>
> When this failure occurred, it appeared to be a raw ceramic body failure.
> This could easily have come from too much pressure coming from a too large
> charge of LiAlH4 for the vacant volume inside the apparatus.  MFMP will
> extract that volume information and relate it to the weight of LiAlH4 that
> was added, as being a benchmark for too much LiAlH4.  The tube used was
> 1/4" OD, but at the moment, I am not sure if it was a 4mm ID tube or a 1/8"
> ID tube.  The Parkhomov tube had an ID of half of its OD.
>
> Bob Higgins
>
> On Fri, Feb 6, 2015 at 11:39 AM, MarkI-ZeroPoint <zeropo...@charter.net
> <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','zeropo...@charter.net');>> wrote:
>
>> At 2:29/2:30 into the short segment posted by Craig, it looks like the
>> right-side end-plug, or whatever is sticking out that end, blows out.  And
>> I use that term specifically since one also sees some hint of a pressure
>> release.  Whether that release is at an appropriate level is apparently
>> debatable...
>> -mark iverson
>>
>

Reply via email to