I may have discovered an error in the paper I wrote on Mizuno. It may be serious enough to invalidate the results. This goes back to what I wrote here on January 21 in response to David Roberson:
> How do you explain the fact that the temperature in the vicinity of the > palladium wire drops very quickly after the pulse? I noticed that. It will take more calibrations to sort out what is going on there. I do not fully trust that thermocouple. . . . I would like to see what's going on in the counter-electrode which is also Pd. I do not want to specify what I have in mind because I am still working on it. I may discover I am getting all upset about nothing. Give me another week or so to sort it out. I will publish full details either way, even if it turns out to be a false alarm. I mention this here just in case Dave or someone else discovers the problem and publishes before I do. (Assuming there is a problem.) To be honest, I am posting this message now mainly because I do not wish to be accused of covering up a serious mistake in my own work. You might call this a claim of negative priority. - Jed
